May 14, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,395 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 14 May 2025

👮‍♂️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

💥 Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware clusters of one mechanised brigade, one tank brigade, one air assault brigade, two assault regiments of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Belopolye, Vorozhba, Iskriskovshchina, Sadki, Pavlovka, Proletarskoye, and Bessalovka (Sumy region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 185 troops, one tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, six motor vehicles, and four field artillery guns. One electronic warfare station, one electronic reconnaissance station, and one materiel depot were destroyed.

📍 Units of the Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Losses were inflicted on formations of four mechanised brigades of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, one national guard brigade, and the Stugna Special Operations Detachment near Glushchenkovo, Druzhelyubovka, Kupyansk-Uzlovoy, Sobolevka, Senkovo (Kharkov region), Kirovsk, and Karpovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 220 troops, one tank, 10 motor vehicles, two artillery guns, one Croatian-made RAK-SA-12 MLRS launcher, and two ammunition depots.

📍 Units of the Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of six mechanised brigades and one assault brigade of the AFU near Seversk, Vasyutinskoye, Verolyubovka, Aleksandro-Shultino, Druzhkovka, Ivanopolye, Zarya, Dyleyevka, and Konstantinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 220 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. One electronic warfare station, two ammunition depots, and one ammunition depot were destroyed.

🚩 As a result of resolute actions, units of the Tsentr Group of Forces liberated Mikhaylovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

🔥 Losses were inflicted on formations of three mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one jaeger brigade of the AFU, and one marine brigade near Krasnoarmeysk, Novoaleksandrovka, Ulyanovka, Novaya Poltavka, Mirolyubovka, Dimitrov, Petrovskoye, and Novosergeyevka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 525 troops, 11 pickup trucks, and two artillery guns.

↗️ Units of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defence. Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Temirovka, Novogrigorovka (Zaporozhye region), Bogatyr, and Volnoye Pole (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 175 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, 10 motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and one electronic warfare station.

💥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of two mechanised brigades, one mountain assault brigade, one coastal defence brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one territorial defence brigade near Orekhov, Kamenskoye, Novodanilovka (Zaporozhye region), Dneprovskoye, and Tokarevka (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 70 troops, five motor vehicles, one UK-made 155-mm Braveheart self-propelled artillery system, one electronic warfare station, and two ammunition depots.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces struck infrastructure of military airfields, one uncrewed surface vehicle depot, ammunition depots, temporary deployment areas of AFU units and foreign mercenaries in 141 areas.

🎯 Air defence units shot down five U.S.-made JDAM guided aerial bombs and one HIMARS MLRS projectile as well as 162 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost:

▫️ 662 aircraft,

▫️ 283 helicopters,

▫️ 57,106 unmanned aerial vehicles,

▫️ 605 anti-aircraft missile systems,

▫️ 23,319 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

▫️ 1,563 MLRS combat vehicles,

▫️ 24,872 field artillery guns and mortars,

▫️ 35,442 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.