May 7, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:   Up to 1,580 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 7 May 2025

💥 Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted strikes on clusters of manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two territorial defence brigades close to Pavlovka, Yunakovka, Miropolye, Turya, and Kazachya Lopan (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 255 troops, one tank, eight armoured fighting vehicles, 25 motor vehicles, three engineering vehicles, one field artillery gun, and one ammunition depot.

🚩 As a result of active and resolute operations, units of the Zapad Group of Forces liberated Lipovoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

🔥 Strikes were inflicted on three mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one National Guard brigade, and one territorial defence brigade near Gusinka, Staroverovka, Kupyansk, Nechvolodovka (Kharkov region) and Yampol (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 230 troops, an armoured fighting vehicle, 11 motor vehicles, five field artillery guns, a Kvertus electronic warfare station, and three ammunition depots.

📍 Units of the Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. They inflicted fire damage on four mechanised brigades, one special operations brigade, and two territorial defence brigades near Seversk, Belaya Gora, Romanovka, Zarya, Konstantinovka, and Katerinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 320 troops, one tank, and 10 armoured fighting vehicles, including four U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, 11 motor vehicles, and five field artillery guns. Three ammunition depots were neutralised.

📍 The Tsentr Group’s units improved the situation along the front line. They hit two mechanised brigades, two assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one marine brigade, and one National Guard brigade near Muravka, Alekseyevka, Zverevo, Mirolyubovka, Novosergeyevka, and Dimitrov (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy lost more than 490 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, eight motor vehicles, one U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS launcher, and two field artillery guns.

↗️ The Vostok Group’s units continued to advance to the depths of the enemy’s defence. They inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades near Bogatyr, Fedorovka (Donetsk People’s Republic), Chervonoye, and Gulyaipole (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ The enemy losses amounted to up to 225 troops, one tank, six armoured fighting vehicles, four motor vehicles, two field artillery guns, and one electronic warfare station.

💥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on one mechanised brigade, mountain assault brigade and one coastal defence brigade near Olgovka, Nikolayevka (Kherson region) and Pavlovka (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ Up to 60 troops, six motor vehicles, and two ammunition depots have been neutralised.

✈️ Operational-tactical aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have hit the launching sites of unmanned aerial vehicles, infrastructure of military airfields, depots of uncrewed surface vehicles and ammunition, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 149 areas.

🎯 Russian air defence systems shot down five Neptune guided long-range missiles, six JDAM guided aerial bombs, and two U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, as well as 524 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost:

 662 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 56,178 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 605 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 23,205 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,559 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 24,529 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 35,127 special military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.