May 19, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense:  Up to 1,880 Ukrainian troops killed or wounded in 24 hours

Russian Defense Ministry


The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. 

▫️ Units of the Sever Group of Forces continue to advance to the depths of the enemy’s defence.  

Strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of the Foreign Legion24th42nd mechanised, 125th territorial defence brigades of the AFU close to Lukyantsy, Vesyoloye, and Radgospnoye (Kharkov region).  

Five counter-attacks of the enemy’s assault groups were repelled close to Volchansk, Liptsy, and Tikhoye (Kharkov region). 

The AFU losses amounted to up to 230 Ukrainian troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, ten pickup trucks, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, and one 122-mm Grad MLRS vehicle. 

▫️ The Zapad Group of Forces’ units captured more advantageous lines, inflicted losses on the AFU 63rd Mechanised Brigade’s units near Torskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).  

The AFU losses amounted to up to 440 Ukrainian troops, two motor vehicles, three 155-mm U.S.-made M777 howitzers, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, and two 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery systems. 

▫️ The Yug Group of Forces’ units improved the situation along the front line, hit manpower and hardware of AFU 79th air assault, 93rd mechanised, 81st airmobile brigades close to Antonovka and Belogorovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).  

In addition, one attack launched by  AFU assault groups was repelled close to Novomikhailovka (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

The AFU losses amounted to more than 680 Ukrainian troops, two tanks, two infantry fighting vehicles, and ten motor vehicles.

In the course of the counter-battery warfare, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, one 122-mm D-30 howitzer, three 105-mm UK-made L-119 howitzers, as well as one 105-mm U.S.-made M119 gun were eliminated.

Two AFU ammunition depots were destroyed. 

▫️ The Tsentr Group of Forces’ units improved the tactical situation, hit tunits of AFU 71st infantry, 47th100th mechanised brigades near Yevgenovka, Novoaleksandrovka, Rozovka, and Novgorodskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).  

Seven counter-attacks launched by units of AFU 59th mechanised infantry, 24th47th mechanised, 142nd143rd infantry brigades were repelled close to Shumy, Neytalovo, Novokalinovo, Umanskoye and Solovyovo (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

The AFU losses amounted to up to 345 Ukrainian troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, two motor vehicles, and one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer.

▫️ The Vostok Group of Forces’ units captured more advantageous lines, inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of the AFU 128th Territorial Defence Brigade close to Velikaya Novosyolka and Makarovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).  

Two attacks launched by assault units of AFU 123rd territorial defence, 21st national guard brigades were repelled close to Urozhaynoye and Staromayorskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

The enemy lost up to 105 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, three motor vehicles, one 155-mm UK-made FH-70 howitzer, as well as one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system. 

▫️ The Dnepr Group of Forces’ units hit manpower and hardware of AFU 37th marine, 65th mechanised brigades close to Vesyoloye (Kherson region) and Rabotino (Zaporozhye region). 

The enemy lost up to 80 troops, five motor vehicles, one 155-mm U.S.-made M777 howitzer, one 152-mm D-20 howitzer, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer. 

▫️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, and Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have engaged clusters of AFU manpower and hardware in 112 areas during the day. 

▫️ Air defence systems have shot down 103 unmanned aerial vehicles during the day, 62 of them fixed-wing aircraft types over the Russian territory at night, one Tochka-U tactical missile, 12 U.S.-made ATACMS operational-tactical missiles, four French-made Hammer aerial bombs, two U.S.-made HARM anti-radiation missiles, as well as nine U.S.-made HIMARS and Olkha MLRS projectiles. 

📊 In total, 601 airplanes and 274 helicopters, 24,374 unmanned aerial vehicles, 522 air defence missile systems, 16,085 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,305 combat vehicles equipped with MLRS, 9,683 field artillery guns and mortars, as well as 21,815 units of special military equipment have been destroyed during the special military operation.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.