October 25, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,905 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

▫️In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade, 92nd Air Assault Brigade, 112th and 113th territorial defence brigades near Liptsy, Volchansk, and Okhrimovka (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 95 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, six motor vehicles, one 152-mm D-20 gun, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, two 122-mm D-30 howitzers, and two ammunition depots.

▫️Units of the Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 14th, 44th mechanised brigades, 77th Airmobile Brigade, 3rd Assault Brigade of the AFU, and 1st National Guard Brigade near Stelmakhovka (Lugansk People’s Republic), Berestovoye, Novoyegorovka (Kharkov region), Olivovsky Yar, and Serebryansky forestry.

Three counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 60th, 67th mechanised brigades of the AFU, and 119th Territorial Defence Brigade were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to more than 490 troops, one tank, one infantry fighting vehicle, four pickup trucks, one UK-made 155-mm Braveheart self-propelled artillery system, one 155-mm M198 howitzer and two 155-mm M114 howitzers made by the USA, one 85-mm D-44 gun, and one Anklav-N electronic warfare station.

▫️Units of the Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions and inflicted losses on formations of the 24th, 33rd, 54th mechanised brigades, 79th Air Assault Brigade, 46th, 81st airmobile brigades of the AFU, and 37th Marine Brigade near Semyonovka, Dalneye, Zvanovka, Seversk, Vesyoly Gai, Ilyinka, Yelizavetovka, Chasov Yar, and Kurakhovo (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses amounted to more than 785 troops, eight motor vehicles, two 152-mm D-20 guns, two 122-mm D-30 howitzers, three M113 armoured personnel carriers and three 105-mm M119 guns made by the USA. 

▫️Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of the enemy’s defences and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 32nd Mechanised Brigade, 95th Air Assault Brigade, 68th Jaeger Brigade of the AFU, 38th Marine Brigade, 109th and 122nd territorial defence brigades near Dimitrov, Dzerzhinsk, Druzhba, Rozovka, Sukhaya Balka, Grishino, and Zarya (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Eleven counter-attacks launched by formations of the 23rd, 93rd, 100th mechanised brigades, 5th Assault Brigade, 49th, 425th assault battalions of the AFU, 38th Marine Brigade, and Lyut Assault Brigade of the National Police of Ukraine were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 465 troops, one infantry fighting vehicle, two M113 armoured personnel carriers and one HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle made by the USA, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, one 152-mm D-20 gun, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, and three 122-mm D-30 howitzers.

2nd Mechanised Brigade, 58th Motorised Infantry Brigade, 48th Assault Battalion of the AFU, and 117th Territorial Defence Brigade near Shakhtyorskoye, Trudovoye, Novopol, and Makarovka (Donetsk People’s Republic). One counter-attack launched by an assault detachment of the 113th Territorial Defence Brigade was repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 100 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, four motor vehicles, two U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzers, and one 152-mm D-20 gun. Three field ammunition depots were eliminated.

▫️Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 35th Marine Brigade, 121st, 124th, 126th territorial defence brigades near Inzhenernoye (Zaporozhye region), Lvovo, Ingulets, and Veletenskoye (Kherson region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 65 troops, six motor vehicles, one 152-mm D-20 gun, and one 152-mm Msta-B towed howitzer. One German-made IRIS-T SAM launcher and one ammunition depot were destroyed.

▫️️Operational-Tactical Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, and Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces delivered strikes at infrastructure of airfields, as well as engaged manpower and military hardware of the enemy in 139 areas.

▫️Air defence units shot down six U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles and 77 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 646 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 34,250 unmanned aerial vehicles, 584 anti-aircraft missile systems, 18,785 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,478 MLRS combat vehicles, 16,657 field artillery guns and mortars, and 27,535 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.