May 10, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:   up to 650 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 10 May 2025

▫️ In accordance with the order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, due to humanitarian reasons, during the holidays on the occasion of the 80th anniversary of the Great Victory, all the Groups of Forces deployed in the special military operation zone continue to strictly observe the ceasefire since 00:00 of 8 May remaining in previously taken positions.

▫️ Despite the announcement of the ceasefire, the AFU formations continued to engage in combat actions against Russian troops. The AFU made four attempts to penetrate the State Border of the Russian Federation in Kursk and Belgorod regions, launched 22 attacks, and made an attempt of reconnaissance-in-force near Tetkino (Kursk region), Pavlovka, Budki (Sumy region), Berezniki (Kharkov region), Novoyegorovka (Lugansk People’s Republic), Lipovoye, Redkodub, Valentinovka, Dzerzhinsk, Romanovka, Novoolenovka, Mirolyubovka, Ulyanovka, Yelizavetovka, Troitskoye, Alekseyevka, Novoaleksandrovka, Kotlyarovka, Novosergeyevka, and Veseloye (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

▫️Along the line of contact, Ukrainian units attacked positions of Russian troops 2,669 times by tube artillery, tanks, and mortars as well as delivered 46 strikes by MLRS projectiles. In addition, 6,562 UAV strikes and munition drops from drones were attempted by the AFU.

▫️ In total, 9,318 violations of the ceasefire have been recorded.

▫️ In these circumstances, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation respond to the violations of the ceasefire by the AFU in an equal manner and will continue to act according to the situation by addressing all criminal assaults of the Kiev regime.

hardware of two territorial defence brigades, which did not observe the temporary ceasefire regime, near Bessalovka and Pavlovka (Sumy region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 220 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 10 motor vehicles, and six field artillery guns. One ammunition depot was destroyed.

🪖  Units of the Zapad Group of Forces repelled an attack of the enemy near Lipovoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 170 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, six motor vehicles, one Grad MLRS launcher, and one NATO-made artillery gun. One Kraken electronic warfare station and one ammunition depot were destroyed. 

🔥 Units of the Yug Group of Forces repelled an attack of the enemy near Valentinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 110 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 10 motor vehicles, and three field artillery guns. One ammunition depot was destroyed.

💥  Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces repelled eight attacks of the enemy near Novoolenovka, Ulyanovka, Mirolyubovka, Yelizavetovka, Kotlyarovka, Novosergeyevka, and Alekseyevka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 130 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, nine motor vehicles, and three field artillery guns. One electronic warfare station was destroyed.

🔥 Units of the Vostok Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades of the AFU, which did not observe the temporary ceasefire regime, near Bogatyr, Zelenoye Pole, and Novopol (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 130 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, four motor vehicles, and two field artillery guns. One U.S.-made AN/TPQ-48 counter-battery radar was destroyed.

💥 Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one mechanised brigade of the AFU, which did not observe the temporary ceasefire regime, near Novodanilovka (Zaporozhye region) and Ponyatovka (Kherson region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 20 troops, six motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun. 

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have not delivered any strikes

🎯 Over the past 24 hours, air defence units shot down one U.S.-made JDAM guided aerial bomb and 86 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles. 

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost: 

▫️ ️662 aircraft,

▫️ 283 helicopters,

▫️ 56,592 unmanned aerial vehicles,

▫️ 605 anti-aircraft missile systems,

▫️ 23,265 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

▫️ 1,561 MLRS combat vehicles,

▫️  24,624 field artillery guns and mortars,

▫️  35,237 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.