July 18, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 8,495 Ukrainian casualties from July 12 to 18

Russian Defense Ministry

โ—๏ธ From 12 to 18 July, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out five group strikes with air-based high-precision weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles to hit Ukrainian defence industry enterprises, infrastructure of military airfields, facilities for assembling and storing attack unmanned aerial vehicles and uncrewed surface vehicles, arsenals, depots of fuel and materiel, TCC facilities, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations, nationalists, and foreign mercenaries.

๐Ÿšฉ During the week, units of the Sever Group of Forces liberated Degtyarnoye (Kharkov region).

๐Ÿ’ฅ Russian troops hit units of two mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade, one motorised infantry brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two territorial defence brigades.

โ†—๏ธ In Sumy region, they continued advancing to the depths of the enemy’s defence. They hit manpower and hardware clusters of three mechanised brigades, two air assault brigades, one jaeger brigade, three assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two territorial defence brigades.

โ–ช๏ธ Over the week, the AFU losses amounted to more than 1,180 troops, 17 armoured fighting vehicles, and 47 motor vehicles in the area of responsibility of the Sever Group of Forces.

โ–ช๏ธ Twenty-eight field artillery guns and six ammunition and materiel depots were neutralised.

๐Ÿ“ The Zapad Group’s units improved the tactical situation. They inflicted fire damage on four mechanised brigades, two assault brigades, one airmobile brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and three territorial defence brigades.

โ–ช๏ธ The enemy lost more than 1,550 troops, one tank, 11 armoured fighting vehicles, including one HMMWV armoured vehicle, and one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier.

โ–ช๏ธ In total, Russian troops neutralised 113 motor vehicles, 13 field artillery guns, including three NATO-made units, 14 electronic warfare stations, and 33 ammunition depots.

๐Ÿšฉ Elements of the Yug Group of Forces continued to advance to the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated Petrovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

๐Ÿ’ฅ They also hit manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade, one assault brigade, and one mountain assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and two territorial defence brigades.

โ–ช๏ธ The AFU losses amounted to more than 1,040 troops and one armoured vehicle in this direction during the week. Moreover, 26 motor vehicles, 13 field artillery guns, six electronic warfare stations, and 17 ammunition and materiel depots were neutralised.

eople’s Republic).

๐Ÿ’ฅ Furthermore, they inflicted fire damage on units of four mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade, one mountain assault brigade, one airborne brigade of the AFU, two marine brigades, two territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades.

โ–ช๏ธ The enemy lost up to 2,975 troops and 16 armoured fighting vehicles. Thirty-three motor vehicles and 21 field artillery guns were eliminated.

๐Ÿšฉ Over the past week, units of the Vostok Group of Forces have advanced to the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated the settlements of Karla Marksa, Voskresenka, Novokhatskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic) and Malinovka (Zaporozhye region).

๐Ÿ’ฅ Moreover, they hit manpower and hardware of five mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, one marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade.

โ–ช๏ธThe AFU sustained losses of more than 1,330 troops, two tanks, 13 armoured fighting vehicles, 78 motor vehicles, 16 field artillery guns, and seven electronic warfare stations.

๐Ÿšฉ Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces liberated Kamenskoye (Zaporozhye region). They hit formations of two mechanised brigades, one mountain assault brigade, one coastal defence brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two territorial defence brigades.

โ–ช๏ธ The AFU lost more than 420 troops and 62 motor vehicles. Moreover, 52 electronic warfare stations, 24 ammunition, materiel, and fuel depots were neutralised.

๐ŸŽฏ Over the past week, Russia’s air defence systems have shot down two U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, two Neptune long-range guided missiles, 28 guided aerial bombs, and 1,387 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

๐Ÿ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost: 

๐Ÿ”น 664 aircraft, 

๐Ÿ”น 283 helicopters, 

๐Ÿ”น 70,353 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

๐Ÿ”น 619 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

๐Ÿ”น 24,249 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

๐Ÿ”น 1,577 MLRS combat vehicles,

๐Ÿ”น 27,529 field artillery guns and mortars,

๐Ÿ”น 38,351 special military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

Itโ€™s not just about recognizing the problem; itโ€™s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.