January 24, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 860 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 24 January 2026

❗️ At night, in response to to the terrorist attacks launched by Ukraine against civilian facilities on the territory of Russia, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a massive strike with long-range, ground- and air-based high-precision weapons, and with strike drones against a plant manufacturing long-range unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as energy facilities used in the interests of the Ukrainian defence industry.

✅ The goals of the strike were achieved. All the assigned targets were engaged.

🚩 As a result of the decisive actions, the Sever Group’s units completed the liberation of Staritsa in Kharkov region.

💥 Russian troops hit units of two mechanised brigades of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade close to Volchanskiye Khutora and Okhrimovka (Kharkov region).

🔥 In Sumy region, strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one assault regiment of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade near Kislaya Dubina, Ivolzhanskoye, Sadki, and Khoten (Sumy region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 145 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, eight motor vehicles, and one electronic warfare station.

📍 The Zapad Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Russian formations engaged two mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and one national guard brigade near Vasilevka, Berezovka, Nechvolodovka, Kovalevka, Kutkovka (Kharkov region), Yarovaya, Krasny Liman, Aleksandrovka, and Ilychevka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses amounted to more than 180 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles, 16 motor vehicles, and one artillery gun. Five ammunition depots were destroyed.

📍 The Yug Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. In addition, strikes were delivered at manpower and hardware of four mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one territorial defence brigade close to Lipovka, Nikiforovka, Kaleniki, Slavyansk, Kramatorsk, Minkovka, Stepanovka, and Konstantinovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 140 troops, seven motor vehicles, five field artillery guns, including two U.S.-made Paladin self-propelled artillery systems, one electronic warfare station, and two ammunition depots.

nemy defence. Manpower and hardware of two assault brigades, two unmanned systems brigades, and four assault regiments of the AFU have been hit near Novoskelevatoye, Volnoye (Dnepropetrovsk region), Vozdvizhevka, Ternovatoye, Petrovka, Novoye Pole, Staroukrainka, and Rizdvyanka (Zaporozhye region). 

▪️ The enemy lost up to 355 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, 15 motor vehicles, and three field artillery guns.

💥 The Dnepr Group’s units inflicted losses on one mechanised brigade and one mountain assault brigade close to Orekhov, Novoyakovlevka, and Veselyanka (Zaporozhye region).

▪️ Up to 40 troops, four motor vehicles, and one electronic warfare station were neutralised.

✈️  Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops, and artillery of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have inflicted damage on the storage areas of long-range unmanned aerial vehicles and training sites of UAV operators, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 157 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down four U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles and 137 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

▫️ 670 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters,

▫️ 110,949 unmanned aerial vehicles,

▫️ 646 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 27,292 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles,

▫️ 1,650 MLRS combat vehicles,

▫️ 32,801 field artillery guns and mortars,

▫️ 52,675 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.