February 27, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 8,725 Ukrainian casualties between February 21-27

Russian Defense Ministry

πŸŽ–πŸŽ– Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 21–27 February 2026

❗️In response to terrorist attacks launched by Ukraine against civilian objects in the territory of the Russian Federation, from 21 to 27 February, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out two massive and six group strikes, which hit enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry, energy, fuel and transport infrastructure facilities used for the interests of the AFU, production, storage, preparation and launch sites of attack unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries.

🚩 During the week, as a result of intensive offensive operations, units of the Sever Group of Forces took Grafskoye in Kharkov region under control. 

πŸ’₯ Russian troops inflicted losses on formations of four mechanised brigades, two motorised infantry brigades, one air assault brigade, one artillery brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades.

β–ͺ️In total, the enemy lost more than 1,485 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles, 78 motor vehicles, and 15 field artillery guns, including two U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzers, in the area of responsibility of the Sever Group of Forces. Three MLRS fighting vehicles, 12 electronic warfare and counter-fire stations, as well as 34 ammunition and materiel depots were eliminated.

🚩 Over the past week, as a result of intensive actions, units of the Zapad Group of Forces liberated Karpovka in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

πŸ’₯ Four mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, one airmobile brigade, one security brigade of the General Staff of the AFU, and two national guard brigades have been hit.

β–ͺ️The AFU losses in this direction amounted to more than 1,260 troops, 20 armoured fighting vehicles, including 11 NATO-made armoured vehicles, 120 motor vehicles, and 18 field artillery guns. Six electronic warfare and counter-fire stations, and 18 ammunition depots were neutralised.

πŸ“The Yuzhnaya Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line. During the week, strikes were delivered at formations of four mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one airmobile brigade, one mountain assault brigade, one assault brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, one territorial defence brigade, and one national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️In the area of responsibility of the Yuzhnaya Group of Forces, the AFU lost more than 940 troops and 37 armoured fighting vehicles, including six Western-made ones. 82 motor vehicles, 15 artillery guns, 14 electronic warfare and counter-fire stations, 24 ammunition, fuel, and materiel depots were neutralised.

hanised brigades, two jaeger brigades, two airmobile brigades, one air assault brigade, one assault regiment of the AFU, two marine brigades, one territorial defence brigade, the Azov Special Operations Forces Brigade, and four national guard brigades.

β–ͺ️During the week, the enemy losses amounted to more than 2,480 troops, 45 armoured fighting vehicles, 64 motor vehicles, eight field artillery guns, and four electronic warfare and counter-fire stations.

🚩  The Vostok Group’s units advanced to the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated Rizdvyanka in Zaporozhye region.

πŸ’₯ During the week, strikes were delivered at formations of three mechanised brigades, two air assault brigades, one assault brigade, five assault regiments of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one territorial defence brigade.

β–ͺ️In total, the enemy lost more than 2,205 troops, 25 armoured fighting vehicles, 74 motor vehicles, and nine artillery guns in the area of responsibility of the Vostok Group of Forces. 

πŸ“ Over the past week, units of the Dnepr Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops hit manpower and military hardware of two mechanised brigades and one mountain assault brigade of the AFU.

πŸ’₯ The AFU losses amounted to up to 355 troops, 93 motor vehicles, 15 electronic warfare and counter-fire stations, as well as 11 ammunition and materiel depots.

▫️  Air defence systems shot down 22 guided aerial bombs, 50 U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, four Neptune long-range cruise missiles, and five Flamingo long-range cruise missiles, as well as 2041 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy has lost: 

 670 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 117,806  unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 651 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 27,911  tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,674 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 33,506 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 55,388 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.