April 25, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 8,760 Ukrainian casualties between April 19-25

Russian Defense Ministry


πŸ’₯ From 19 to 25 April, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out one massive and five group strikes with high-precision weapons and attack drones, which hit enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry, infrastructure of military airfields, depots storing weapons and ammunition, testing areas for tactical missiles, production and storage sites of attack unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries.

πŸ”₯ During the week, the Sever Group of Forces continued to rout AFU units in Kursk region.

🚩  In the course of active offensive actions, Oleshnya (Kursk region) has been liberated.

✈️  Aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, and artillery fire hit manpower and hardware of one tank brigade, three mechanised brigades, three air assault brigades, one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and a territorial defence brigade.

πŸ’₯  In Belgorod and Kharkov directions, the Russian troops hit elements of three mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one air assault brigade, one assault regiment of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, as well as three territorial defence brigades.

β–ͺ️ In a week, over 1,320 militants have been neutralised in the area of responsibility of the Sever Group of Forces. Two tanks, 23 armoured fighting vehicles, including one HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle and one U.S.-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, 55 motor vehicles, seven MLRS launchers, 50 field artillery guns, eight electronic warfare stations, and five ammunition and materiel depots were neutralised.

🚩  As a result of resolute actions of the Zapad Group of Forces, Novomikhaylovka (Donetsk People’s Republic) has been liberated.

πŸ’₯  The Russian troops inflicted losses on enemy manpower and hardware of six mechanised brigades, a jaeger brigade, an assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, two territorial defence brigades, and a national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️ The enemy losses amounted to more than 1,535 troops, three tanks, 11 armoured fighting vehicles including a HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle, two U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, and a Turkish-made Kirpi armoured fighting vehicle. Two MLRS launchers, 38 motor vehicles, 19 field artillery guns including three NATO-made guns, 11 electronic warfare and counter-fire stations as well as 16 ammunition depots, were neutralised.

🚩 Servicemen of the Yug Group of Forces liberated Shevchenko, Sukhaya Balka, and Tarasovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

πŸ’₯ Russian units hit five mechanised brigades, two assault brigades, a motorised infantry brigade, an airmobile brigade, an air assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, three territorial defence brigades, and a national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️ Over the past week, Ukrainian armed groups have suffered losses of over 2,065 militants, three tanks, 31 armoured fighting vehicles including two U.S.-made HMMWV armoured fighting vehicles, and three U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers. Two MLRS launchers including a U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS, 60 motor vehicles, 31 field artillery guns were eliminated including eight Western-made, seven electronic warfare stations, 17 ammunition, fuel, and supply depots.

πŸ’₯ Russian troops engaged manpower and hardware of a heavy mechanised brigade, three mechanised brigades, two assault brigades, an airmobile brigade, a jaeger brigade, an unmanned aerial vehicles brigade, an assault regiment of the AFU, two marine brigades, a territorial defence brigade, and two national guard brigades.

β–ͺ️ The enemy losses were more than 2,345 troops, two tanks, 20 armoured fighting vehicles including a HMMWV armoured fighting vehicle, a U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, a German-made Marder IFV, and a French-made VAB armoured personnel carrier. Moreover, 30 motor vehicles, and 11 field artillery guns were destroyed.

↗️ Elements of the Vostok Group of Forces continued advancing into the depth of enemy defence. Russian elements damaged two mechanised brigades, a jaeger brigade, an airmobile brigade, an air assault brigade, an unmanned aerial vehicles brigade of the AFU, a marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and a national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 990 troops, two tanks, and 16 armoured fighting vehicles including a U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier. Thirty-nine motor vehicles, 16 field artillery guns four of which were manufactured by NATO countries, and three electronic warfare stations have been eliminated.

πŸ“ The Dnepr Group of Forces’ units took more advantageous lines and positions. The Russian Armed Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, two artillery brigades, three coastal defence brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and two territorial defence brigades.

β–ͺ️ The AFU lost more than 505 troops, a tank, and a Turkish-made Kirpi armoured vehicle. Forty-one motor vehicles, 10 field artillery guns, 18 electronic and counter-fire warfare stations as well as nine ammunition depots have been neutralised.

🎯 Over the past week, air defence units have shot down 31 JDAM guided aerial bombs and 12 HIMARS MLRS projectiles, four Czech-made Vampire MLRS projectiles as well as 993 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š  Since the beginning of the special military operation, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have neutralised: 

661 aircraft, 

283 helicopters, 

53,585 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

605 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

23,035 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

1,553 MLRS combat vehicles, 

24,098 field artillery guns and mortars, 

34,582 units of support vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.