February 6, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 9,080 Ukrainian casualties from Jan 31 to Feb 6

Russian Defense Ministry

πŸŽ–πŸŽ– by Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 31 January β€” 6 February 2026

❗️From 31 January to 6 February, in response to Ukrainian terrorist attacks launched on civilian facilities in Russia, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered one massed and five group strikes, which hit Ukrainian defence industry enterprises, power and transport infrastructure objects used by the AFU, ammunition depots, production sites and storages of attack unmanned aerial vehicles as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries.

🚩 Over the past week, as a result of resolute offensive actions, units of the Sever Group of Forces liberated Zelenoye (Kharkov region) and, on 5 February, took Popovka (Sumy region) under control.

πŸ’₯ Losses were inflicted on formations of three mechanised brigades, one airmobile brigade, two assault regiments of the AFU, two territorial defence brigades, one national guard brigade, and two border detachments of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine.

β–ͺ️ In the Sever Group’s area of responsibility, the AFU losses amounted to more than 1,415 troops, one tank, two armoured fighting vehicles, 78 motor vehicles, nine field artillery guns, and four U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS launchers.

πŸ”₯In addition, three electronic warfare stations and counter-fire radars as well as 33 ammunition and materiel depots were destroyed.

▫️ Over the past week, units of the Zapad Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of four mechanised brigades, two airmobile brigades, one air assault brigade, two assault brigades of the AFU, two territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️ In this direction, the AFU losses amounted to more than 1,180 troops, one tank, 14 armoured fighting vehicles, 105 motor vehicles, and 15 field artillery guns. In addition, 29 ammunition and materiel depots were destroyed.

🚩 As a result of resolute actions, units of the Yug Group of Forces liberated Stepanovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

πŸ’₯ Losses were inflicted on formations of four mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one airmobile brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and two territorial defence brigades.

β–ͺ️ Over the past week, in the Yug Group’s area of responsibility, the AFU losses amounted to more than 1,050 troops, five tanks, 19 armoured fighting vehicles, including five foreign-made samples. In addition, 105 motor vehicles, 16 artillery guns, five electronic warfare stations and counter-fire radars, 27 ammunition, POL, and materiel depots.

Units of the Tsentr Group of Forces continued resolute offensive actions and liberated Toretskoye and Sukhetskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

πŸ’₯ Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades, two jaeger brigades, one airmobile brigade, one air assault brigade, two assault regiments of the AFU, one marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and three national guard brigades.

β–ͺ️ Over the past week, in this direction, the AFU losses amounted to more than 2,560 troops, one tank, 35 armoured fighting vehicles, 81 motor vehicles, and 13 field artillery guns.

🚩 Units of the Vostok Group of Forces advanced into the depth of the enemy’s defences and liberated Staroukrainka, Petrovka, and Pridorozhnoye (Zaporozhye region).

πŸ’₯ Over the past week, losses were inflicted on formations of four mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, three assault regiments of the AFU, one marine brigade, two territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade.

β–ͺ️In the Vostok Group’s area of responsibility, the AFU losses amounted to more than 2,545 troops, three tanks, 36 armoured fighting vehicles, 96 motor vehicles, and six artillery guns.

▫️ Over the past week, units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, and one territorial defence brigade.

β–ͺ️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 330 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, 62 motor vehicles, eight artillery guns, one Buk SAM system, 12 electronic warfare stations and counter-fire radars as well as six materiel depots.

▫️ Air defence systems shot down 23 guided aviation bombs, 63 U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, four Neptune long-range guided missiles, and 1,080 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

πŸ“Š In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy has lost: 

 670 aircraft, 

 283 helicopters, 

 112,714 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

 650 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

 27,522 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

 1,659 MLRS combat vehicles, 

 33,107 field artillery guns and mortars, 

 53,786 units of support military vehicles

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.