November 3, 2024

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

Russian Defense Ministry

▫️In Kharkov region, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 47th Mechanised Brigade, 17th Tank Brigade of the AFU, 4th Border Detachment of the Ukrainian Border Service, and foreign mercenaries near Malinovka, Makarikha, Odnorobovka, and Goptovka (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses amounted to more than 30 troops, two motor vehicles, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers.

▫️Units of the Zapad Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 30th, 60th, 63rd, 92nd, 116th mechanised brigades, and 3rd Assault Brigade of the AFU near Petropavlovka, Golubovka, Pershotravnevoye, Kupyansk (Kharkov region), and Terny (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Five counter-attacks launched by assault detachments of the 14th, 44th mechanised brigades, and 3rd Tank Brigade of the AFU were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 460 troops, one infantry fighting vehicle, three motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzer, and one UK-made 105-mm L-119 gun. Three ammunition depots were wiped out.

▫️Units of the Yug Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of the enemy’s defences and inflicted losses on formations of the 23rd, 28th, 33rd, 54th, 67th, 72nd mechanised brigades, 3rd Tank Brigade, 46th, 81st airmobile brigades, 79th Air Assault Brigade of the AFU, and 119th Territorial Defence Brigade near Andreyevka, Konstantinovka, Dalneye, Chasov Yar, Ilyinka, Berestky, Kurakhovo, Seversk, and Dronovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Four counter-attacks launched by units of the AFU 33rd Mechanised Brigade were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to more than 520 troops, 12 motor vehicles, one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier, two U.S.-made 105-mm M119 guns, two 122-mm D-30 howitzers, and two ammunition depots.

▫️As a result of active offensive operations, units of the Tsentr Group of Forces liberated Vishnevoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Losses were inflicted on manpower and hardware of the 32nd, 93rd mechanised brigades, 25th Airborne Brigade, 68th Jaeger Brigade of the AFU, 35th Marine Brigade, and 122th Territorial Defence Brigade near Dimitrov, Petrovka, Novoselidovka, Shcherbinovka, Dzerzhinsk, and Nelepovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Ten counter-attacks launched by formations of the 35th, 42nd, 100th, 117th, 150th mechanised brigades, 152nd Jaeger Brigade, 49th and 425th assault battalions of the AFU were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to more than 500 troops, one tank, one UK-made Spartan armoured personnel carrier, one Kozak armoured fighting vehicle, four pickup trucks, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, one 122-mm D-30 howitzer as well as one M113 armoured personnel carrier, one MaxxPro armoured fighting vehicle, and one 105-mm M119 gun made by the USA.

▫️Units of the Vostok Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line and inflicted losses on formations of the 152nd Jaeger Brigade of the AFU, 37th Marine Brigade, and 113th Territorial Defence Brigade near Uspenovka, Velikaya Novosyolka, Razdolnoye, Makarovka, and Ostrovskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

One counter-attack launched by an assault battalion of the AFU 23rd Mechanised Brigade was repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 105 troops, one tank, three motor vehicles, and one French-made 155-mm Caesar self-propelled artillery system.

▫️Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 110th Mechanised Brigade, 141st Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 124th and 126th territorial defence brigades near Nikopol (Dnepropetrovsk region), Ponyatovka, Tokarevka (Kherson region), and Nesteryanka (Zaporozhye region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 60 troops, two motor vehicles, and one ammunition depot.

▫️Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, and Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces destroyed one U.S.-made AN/TPQ-37 counter-battery radar, struck one train with AFU hardware on a loading station, infrastructure of military airfields, power objects and oil base, which supply AFU, UAV workshops, as well as engaged manpower clusters and military hardware in 140 areas.

Air defence units shot down four U.S.-made ATACMS operational-tactical missiles, one U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectile, and 47 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 647 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 35,216 unmanned aerial vehicles, 585 anti-aircraft missile systems, 19,031 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,484 MLRS combat vehicles, 17,245 field artillery guns and mortars, and 27,956 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.