August 6, 2025

The Hudson Institute: Chinese mercenaries join Russia’s battle against Ukraine 

Hudson Institute

Ukraine Military Situation Report | August 6

Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War.

Executive Summary

— Chinese nationals fight in Ukraine: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy announced that Chinese nationals are involved in the Russian offensive in Kharkiv.

— Battlefield assessment: The Russian military remained on the offensive and pounded Ukraine with Shahed drones and aeroballistic missiles.

— Ukraine’s deep-strike campaign: Ukraine struck a railway station in Rostov Oblast and a military airfield in occupied Crimea.

1. Battlefield Assessment

Fighting in Ukraine continued at a high operational tempo last week, with Russian forces making tactical gains. Pokrovsk and Lymansk remained flashpoints, while the Russian military pushed deeper in Toretsk, Novopavlivka, and Poltavka.

Russia has suffered over one million casualties since commencing its full-scale invasion. But defense intelligence from the United Kingdom has revealed that the rate of those casualties has been declining since March 2025. As the Ukrainian military suffers from severe manpower shortages and heavy losses in eastern Ukraine, the decline in Russian casualties is a worrying sign for Kyiv.

Last week Russia also continued to pound Ukraine from the skies. On August 4 the Russian military used Kinzhal aeroballistic missiles to hit hardened shelters at the Starokostiantyniv air base. The base hosts Ukraine’s F-16 aircraft and endured Russian strikes in 2024 when Kyiv first received its Western jets.

The Ukrainian Air Force reports that Russia continues to indiscriminately strike Ukrainian population centers. Russian forces are deploying strike packages of missiles and robotic warfare assets, with a conspicuous hike in Shahed drone usage in recent months. Open-source evidence suggests that Russia is now using anti-tank mines as warheads on its Lancet loitering munitions.

As first-person-view (FPV) drones blanket the battlespace, tactical combat units are focusing on new anti-drone training and weaponry. Many Russian and Ukrainian brigades and battalions have begun to equip their personnel with shotguns to protect against incoming aerial threats.

Kyiv also continued to conduct deep strikes against high-value targets inside Russia and occupied Ukraine. On August 4 drone teams from the Ukrainian Security Service (SBU) hit five Russian tactical military aviation platforms deployed in the Saki military airfield in occupied Crimea. The salvo damaged three Su-24 frontline bombers, reportedly destroyed one Su-30SM multirole combat aircraft, and hit a weapons storage facility in the area.

During the night of August 5, Ukrainian drones also targeted the Tatsinskaya railway station in Russia’s Rostov Oblast, sparking a fire in the compound and disrupting its operations. Russia uses the railway station, roughly 190 miles from Ukraine-held areas near Pokrovsk and 62 miles from the Russia-Ukraine border, to move grain and conduct logistics for nearby oil facilities.

2. Chinese Mercenary Presence in Occupied Ukraine

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy officially acknowledged that a large contingent of foreign troops, among them many Chinese nationals, is fighting alongside the Russian military in the Kharkiv sector. The Ukrainian press has reported that at least 163 Chinese fighters have served in Russian units since April 2025.

Ukrainian troops have uploaded several videos of captured Chinese mercenaries. While no regular Chinese military units have officially deployed to fight for Russia, evidence suggests that the Chinese government has done nothing to stop its citizens from joining the fight—and may have in some ways encouraged doing so. Most Chinese mercenaries learn about the war through a Russian advertising campaign on China’s Douyin social media platform. Evidence suggests that Douyin allows recruitment ads but blocks any uploads detailing Chinese casualties in the conflict. In an online ecosystem as tightly controlled as China’s, this discrepancy is no accident.

To date, Ukrainian counterespionage efforts have also documented how Chinese intelligence networks have infiltrated Ukraine, particularly its defense technological and industrial base (DTIB). While the extent of this penetration remains to be seen, Kyiv should work urgently to limit the possible damage.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.