March 4, 2026

The Hudson Institute Ukraine captured more territory than it lost in February

Hudson Institute

Ukraine Military Situation Report | March 4

Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War.

Executive Summary

— Battlefield assessment: Last month Russian forces reportedly lost more Ukrainian territory than they gained. Kyiv had not achieved this level of success since November 2023. 

— Ukrainian drone diplomacy in the Middle East: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy conducted diplomatic outreach to the Gulf Arab states, offering Kyiv’s counter-drone expertise to the embattled region in exchange for support for Ukraine’s efforts to achieve a ceasefire with Russia.

1. Battlefield Assessment

Last week Russian and Ukrainian forces waged mid- to high-tempo combat operations, fighting an average of between 100 and 200 hundred engagements per day. At the strategic level, Russian formations remained on the offensive. The Kremlin’s offensive-minded approach—trading high casualty rates for incremental territorial gains—has led to more than 1.25 million Russian casualties in the war thus far.  

Pokrovsk, Kostiantynivka, Huliaipole, and Sloviansk saw particularly heavy clashes last week. Both sides used first-person-view drones to strike a broad target set, including heavy armor and personnel. Ukraine’s special forces and intelligence services continued to target the energy infrastructure that allows Moscow to fund its war

Despite sustained Russian pressure, Ukrainian units conducted localized tactical pushes across multiple flashpoints. Ukrainian Air Assault Forces made gains on the front lines near Oleksandrivka, reportedly recapturing multiple settlements from Russian control.  

Ukraine’s high command claimed that Kyiv recaptured more territory in February 2026 than it lost, though this assertion has yet to be independently verified. Some private intelligence assessments support Kyiv’s conclusion, and indicate that February marks the first month since November 2023 in which Russian forces suffered a net loss of territory. 

2. Ukraine Conducts Drone Diplomacy in the Middle East

Last week Kyiv sought to expand its diplomatic campaign to end the war, as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy offered to send Ukrainian drone and air-defense specialists to multiple countries in the Middle East in exchange for political support for a ceasefire in the Russia-Ukraine War. 

Ukraine certainly has sufficient experience with drone warfare to advise and support prospective partners. Since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in 2022, Ukrainian forces have intercepted over 44,000 Shahed drones and derivatives. Ukraine faces Shahed attacks nearly every day.  

As a result, Kyiv now fields the most combat-tested counter-drone architecture in Europe. Ukraine’s drone defenses include artificial intelligence–enabled acoustic detection networks such as Sky Fortress, the Wild Hornets group’s STING Shahed-hunting drone, and agile mobile air-defense teams. 

President Zelenskyy’s Middle East diplomatic initiative underscores Ukraine’s confidence in the counter-drone and air defense capabilities it has forged while persistently defending against loitering munitions originally produced by Iran. Ukrainian officials now want to use their operational expertise—in layered air-defense integration, electronic warfare adaptation, and accelerated innovation cycles—as an exportable security asset capable of generating diplomatic support. 

Ukraine’s approach is rooted in both military and diplomatic considerations. Militarily, Kyiv seeks to position itself as a credible provider of expertise to states facing similar drone threats. Diplomatically, Ukraine aims to demonstrate to regional actors with ties to Moscow that it can offer tangible value that the Kremlin cannot provide. The objective driving Ukraine’s strategy is to apply indirect pressure: if Middle Eastern stakeholders view Ukraine as a net security contributor, they may be more willing to press Moscow to accept a ceasefire in its war with Kyiv.  

Ukraine is attempting to translate battlefield innovation into strategic leverage. The outcome of its efforts, however, will hinge less on Kyiv’s technical prowess than on the skill of its diplomatic efforts. 

3. What to Monitor in the Coming Weeks

1. Russia’s failure last week to gain additional Ukrainian territory may trigger the Kremlin’ Soviet-era reflexes to reshuffle senior military leadership. 

2. As Iran continues to strike Gulf Arab states with loitering munitions, these nations may turn to Ukraine for assistance in counter-drone defense.   

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.