February 28, 2024

Ukrainian General Staff: About 1,060 Russian troops killed or wounded in 24 hours; 28 tanks and APC’s destroyed or disabled

Ukraine Defense Ministry

The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 28.02.24 were approximately:

personnel ‒ about 412610 (+1060) persons,

tanks ‒ 6570 (+14),

APV ‒ 12508 (+14),

artillery systems – 10029 (+20),

MLRS – 1000 (+0),

Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 688 (+2),

aircraft – 342 (+2),

helicopters – 325 (+0),

UAV operational-tactical level – 7753 (+24),

cruise missiles ‒ 1912 (+0),

warships / boats ‒ 25 (+0),

submarines – 1 (+0),

vehicles and fuel tanks – 13112 (+47),

special equipment ‒ 1594 (+6)

General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine

Situation update as of 6 p.m., February 28, 2024

Glory to Ukraine! Day 735 of the russian full-scale military aggression against Ukraine continues.

The enemy continues to wage a war of aggression. Despite significant losses, it does not abandon its plans for the complete occupation of Ukraine, ignores the laws and customs of war, uses terror tactics, launches strikes, and attacks both military and civilian targets. The enemy is actively using aircraft and FPV quadcopters, conducting assault operations with the support of armored vehicles.

The operational situation in eastern and southern Ukraine remains difficult.

During the day of February 28, there were 79x combat engagements. 

The enemy launched a total of 5x missile and 91x air strikes, carried out 102x MLRS attacks at the positions of Ukrainian troops and various settlements. Unfortunately, russian terrorist attacks resulted in killed and wounded civilians. Residential private and apartment buildings, as well as other infrastructure were destroyed and damaged. 

Volyn and Polissya axes: no significant changes. No signs of formation of an offensive group. Certain units of the armed forces of belarus continue their missions in the areas bordering Ukraine.

Sivershchyna and Slobozhanshchyna axes: the adversary maintains its military presence in the areas of russia bordering Ukraine. The enemy continues its sabotage and reconnaissance activities, shelling Ukrainian settlements from the territory of russia and increases the density of minefields along the state border of Ukraine. The adversary launched air strikes in the vicinities of Ploske, Budarky, Varvarivka (Kharkiv oblast). More than 30x settlements came under enemy artillery and mortar fire, including Prohres (Chernihiv oblast), Fotovyzh, Seredyna-Buda, Stara Huta (Sumy oblast), Strilecha, Luk’yantsi, Starytsya, Vovchans’k (Kharkiv oblast).

Kup’yans’k axis: the Ukrainian Defense Forces repelled 1x attacks near Tabaivka, where the occupiers made attempts to dislodge Ukrainian troops from their positions. The adversary launched air strikes in the vicinities of Kup’yans’k and Syn’kivka (Kharkiv oblast). The invaders fired artillery and mortars at more than 10x settlements, including Zapadne, Syn’kivka, Ivanivka, Kotlyarivka (Kharkiv oblast).

Lyman axis: the Ukrainian defenders repelled 6x assaults near Terny, Yampolivka (Donetsk oblast) and Bilohorivka (Luhansk oblast), where the adversary made attempts to breach Ukrainian defense. The invaders launched air strikes in the vicinities of Novojehorivka, Makiivka, Bilohorivka (Luhansk oblast), Terny, Rozdolivka (Donetsk oblast). The enemy fired artillery and mortars at more than 10x settlements, including Nevs’ke, Bilohorivka (Luhansk oblast), Yampolivka, Tors’ke, Rozdolivka (Donetsk oblast).

Bakhmut axis: the Ukrainian Defense Forces repelled 8x attacks in the vicinities of Ivanivske, Klishchiivka (Donetsk oblast), where the occupiers made attempts to improve their tactical situation. The invaders launched air strikes near Vasyutyns’ke and Chasiv Yar (Donetsk oblast). Around 10x settlements came under artillery and mortar fire, including Hryhorivka, Chasiv Yar, Andriivka, Druzhba (Donetsk oblast). 

Avdiivka axis: the Ukrainian defenders repelled 20x attacks in the vicinities of Berdychi, Orlivka, Tonen’ke, Pervomais’ke, Nevel’s’ke (Donetsk oblast). The adversary launched air strikes near Oleksandropil’, Ocheretyne, Novobakhmutivka, Novoselivka Persha, Orlivka, Netailove (Donetsk oblast). The invaders fired artillery and mortars at around 20x settlements, including Keramik, Novokalynove, Novobakhmutivka, Semenivka, Orlivka, Pervomais’ke (Donetsk oblast).

Novopavlivka axis: the Ukrainian Defense Forces continue to hold back the invaders in the vicinities of Krasnohorivka, Heorhiivka, Novomykhailivka and Urozhaine (Donetsk oblast). In that area, the invaders, with air support, made 25x attempts to breach Ukrainian defense. The adversary launched air strikes near Kurakhove, Vuhledar, Staromaiors’ke (Donetsk oblast), Novodarivka (Zaporizhzhia oblast). The enemy fired artillery and mortars at more than 20x settlements, including Krasnohorivka, Heorhiivka, Novomykhailivka, Kostyantynivka, Vuhledar, Blahodatne, Staromaiors’ke (Donetsk oblast).

Orikhiv axis: the Ukrainian Defense Forces repelled 1x attack east of Robotyne (Zaporizhzhia oblast). The enemy launched an air strike in the vicinity of Malynivka (Zaporizhzhia oblast). Around 20x settlements, including Malynivka, Chervone, Mala Tokmachka, Novodanylivka, P’yatykhatky (Zaporizhzhia oblast), were under artillery and mortar fire of the occupiers.

Odesa operational-strategic group, Kherson axis: the occupiers do not abandon their intention to drive Ukrainian units out of their footholds on the left bank of the Dnipro. During the day, the enemy made 3x attempt to assault positions of Ukrainian troops. Around 20x settlements, including L’vove, Ponyativka, Kherson, Antonivka (Kherson oblast), came under artillery and mortar fire of the occupiers. 

During the day of February 28, the Ukrainian Air Force launched air strikes on 7x concentrations of enemy troops. 

The Ukrainian missile troops hit 1x command post, 1x concentration of troops, weapons and military equipment, 4x artillery systems, 1x air defense system and 1x electronic warfare station, 1x important target of the russian invaders. 

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.