June 22, 2023
The Israeli-Russian relationship is rather one-sided benefiting the Russian state, and is one of economic, security, and uniquely issued around the role of Russian Jews. Back in the times of the Soviet Union, it was an anti-Zionist state because this movement could take away workers against capitalism, but after a couple of decades with Soviet support, the Israeli state was created. Throughout the time of the Soviet Union, Jewish emigration from the state relied on global relations between the two nations and the rest of the world. If these two nations were in peace around thirty thousand Soviet Jews could emigrate, while in conflict that number would be halted to around twelve thousand people. Post Soviet Union, in the Putin era, certain points of the bilateral relations were great, shown by Israeli commercials being broadcasted by Russian satellites. But, in the latest news, Russia and Israel clash in views surrounding the Russian-Ukrainian war due to President Zelinsky of Ukraine being of Jewish faith and Israel providing Ukraine with warning systems. Following the lecture, Professor Freidman discusses on topics including short-term vs. long-term international relationships, the
significance of Soviet Jew emigration, and recommendations for the Israeli Palestinian conflict.
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
