March 3, 2009
Ambassador of the Russian Federation, Sergey I. Kislyak, discusses the future of U.S.-Russia bilateral relations, describing his disbelief in another cold war. Russia and the U.S. are both market economies that value peace and prosperity. After the Cold War, the U.S. somewhat expected that Russia would follow all of its advice, and Russia in turn expected an automatic friend out of the U.S. However, neither of those things fully materialized. At this point, Russia had to build a new country from the ground up – reorienting collective ownership of assets to a socially-oriented market economy. While Russia followed some U.S. advice, it was also clear that America had its own agenda. Russia has its problems with NATO decisions, such as those taken by member nations in Kosovo and Serbia, despite trying and failing to build better relations with the organization. At this point in time, NATO has voted to suspend its partnership with Russia. Despite these struggles, the U.S. still needs Russian support in Afghanistan, trade has not halted, and mutual investment is being encouraged. In fact, this economic relationship can help to build a stronger political relationship.
https://bcfausa.org/video/the-agenda-for-united-states-russia-relations/
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
