April 16, 2014

The Triangle of Ukraine, Russia and The West

Steven Pifer, Former US Ambassador to Ukraine

Pifer breaks up the situation with Russia, Ukraine, and the West into different sections. He starts with the basic question of: why should we care? He discusses how Ukraine has been a good partner of the US and how Putin is breaking rules that should have consequences for a strong Western response. He then goes into the downfall of Ukraine with President Yanukovych because they didn’t join the EU, protests erupted, there was a sense of authoritarianism, and the Ukrainians were strongly against force and violence. When the president eventually fled, the new administrations raised questions of legitimacy. Now, the Ukrainian government is very fragile, and they are working towards a diffusion of power. There are intense economic challenges that they are working through with the IMF. There is a concern with managing the politics of the reforms that are to come. Finally, more issues are arising as Russia wants to destabilize Ukraine. Pifer then hits on the possible motivations of Putin and the response from the West which basically involve supporting Ukraine, punishing Russia, and reassuring NATO. Pifer emphasizes that this will be a long-term crisis and any type of solution needs to be sustainable in order to handle it. 

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.