PROFESSOR OF PRACTICE, PENN STATE SCHOOL OF INTERNATIONAL AFFAIRS
North Korea and Nuclear Weapons Proliferation
DATE: October 7, 2020 6:00 pm
In 2017 North Korea tested a thermonuclear weapon and intercontinental ballistic missiles with ranges that can reach the United States’ mainland. We now know that President Trump and North Korean leader Kim Jong Un believed war between the U.S. and DPRK was likely. In 2018, a North Korean initiated summit changed the trajectory of the problem and it seemed to be heading towards a negotiated solution. But the effort failed and North Korea’s leadership this year has rejected any further engagement. While the diplomatic engagement of 2018-19 did create a pause in DPRK nuclear and long-range missile testing, the country has continued to build nuclear weapons and missiles in the interim. If their past behavior is any guide, we can expect the North Koreans to do something to grab the U.S. President’s attention early next year. How the next Administration – whoever wins the election – responds could be fateful. Viable options to deal with a North Korean challenge are much less numerous than they were in 2017.
The U.S. and North Korea came close to war in 2017 because leaders on both sides have large blind spots and cannot recognize that there are interim solutions to their security problems. On the U.S. side, there is a lack of appreciation for the limits of its tools to achieve its goals. Ironically, the real threat of nuclear war is not being generated by North Korea’s technological developments, but rather by panic over its achievements. There are still paths available to stabilize the situation and to manage the problem of a nuclear-armed North Korea to the advantage of the U.S. and its allies. This needs to start with an appreciation for North Korean motives and how the problem looks to others with deep interests.
This talk will discuss the history and development of North Korea after WWII, the historical roots of why the North Korean leadership acts the way that it does, the lens through which the North Korean leadership sees the rest of the world, their development of nuclear warheads and intercontinental ballistic missiles, and previous attempts by the U.S. and its allies to prevent the development of these weapons. The talk will conclude with options available to the U.S. to deal with North Korea.
Be the First to Hear about Upcoming Speakers
The Baltimore Council on Foreign Affairs is purely a local organization in programming, governance and support.
© BCFA All Rights Reserved.
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.