June 24, 2021
The “Rubicon” of global trade has been crossed—there is no turning back, and there is no decoupling. The purpose of supply chains is simple, ensuring a reliable supply of stuff. The execution of said goal is incredibly difficult. Although risks in the supply chain cannot be eliminated, they may be mitigated. Mr. Carmel says that the best way to ensure the reliable supply of stuff is not through isolationist policies but through a continuation of the global system of comparative advantage production. There will be times when supply chains falter—through ecological disaster, human error, or terrorist disruption—but these risks pale in comparison to the possible breakdowns brought by a non-trading world.
Mr. Stephen Carmel emphasizes the importance of understanding global supply chains. He believes that understanding the supply chain’s role within national security is critical—specifically the prevalence of foreign dependency within supply chains. Although, he also points out that there is very little we can do at this point in terms of becoming less dependent on foreign sources. Carmel also makes many implications that the federal government often does harm to the global supply chain and makes the flow of goods more complicated. Yet, when considering this fact, it is important to note Carmel’s role as Senior Vice President of Maersk Link, a private shipping company and how that may skew is perception of the federal government’s role.
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
