Former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development, The Department of Defense
The Case for Prioritizing Taiwan Over Ukraine
DATE: November 6, 2023 6:00 pm
LOCATION: Zoom Only
As Republicans attempt to organize the House of Representatives and agree on a national agenda in the coming weeks, one of the key decisions will be whether to send more aid to Ukraine. House Speaker Kevin McCarthy personally favored aid but stripped it from the Continuing Resolution on September 30th in an effort to appease ultra-hardliners. They voted to oust him nonetheless. Yet there’s a sizable majority in both chambers that favor more aid to Ukraine. McCarthy himself tied the case for aid to the lessons of appeasing Hitler on the eve of World War II.
The most coherent argument for stripping the aid is that made by a former Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense who will be our next speaker. In this era of great power competition, says
Elbridge Colby, China is a bigger foe than Russia, and the top U.S. priority should be deterring a Chinese invasion of Taiwan. It’s a controversial thesis, and that’s an understatement. In an op-ed he wrote in the Washington Post a few months back, he argued that the U.S. should “prioritize” Taiwan over Ukraine and let its allies take “primary responsibility for Europe’s conventional defense.” His essay provoked 1,099 online comments. Here’s a sampling from the first 50. “You’re wrong…What a narrow vision…We can in fact walk and chew gum at the same time here…Civilians are being murdered by Russians in Ukraine! I don’t see anyone being murdered in Taiwan…I hope that no decision maker pays attention to the advice offered in his article. It is a recipe for war with China…Gosh no, it’s a recipe for reprehensible capitulation in Ukraine!”
Elbridge Colby spoke to the Baltimore Council two years ago, promoting his new book, The Strategy of Denial, American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict.
He is co-founder and principal of The Marathon Initiative, a policy initiative focused on developing strategies for an era of sustained great power competition. He served as the Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy and Force Development from 2017-2018. In that role, he was the lead official in the development and rollout of the Department’s 2018 National Defense Strategy (NDS). The NDS shifted the Department of Defense’s focus to the challenges to U.S. military superiority and interests posed by China and Russia. He also served as a primary Defense Department representative in the development of the President’s 2017 National Security Strategy. From 2014 to 2017 he was the Robert M. Gates Senior Fellow at the Center for New American Security. From 2010 to 2013 he was principal analyst and division lead for global strategic affairs at Center for Naval Analyses.
Please join us November 6th at 6 pm for what should be a lively debate on whether to “prioritize” Taiwan over Ukraine.
Elbridge A. Colby bio: Elbridge Colby | The Marathon Initiative
Department of Defense bio: Elbridge A. Colby > U.S. Department of Defense > Biography
Career:
Co-founder & Principal – The Marathon Initiative, 2019-present
Director of the Defense Program – Center for a New America n Security (CNAS), 2018-2019
Deputy Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy & Force Development, 2017-2018
National Defense Panel, 2014
Strategic Posture Commission, 2008-2009
Office of National Intelligence, 2005-2006
President’s Weapons of Mass Destruction Commission (Iraq WMD intelligence), 2004-2005
Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq, 2003
Education:
Yale Law School, 2009
Harvard College, 2002
Publications:
The Strategy of Denial: American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict (Yale University Press, 2021)
World events are not going America’s way, The Spectator, 09/13/23
The Strategy of Denial: American Defense in an Age of Great Power Conflict, BCFA presentation,
11/17/21
The United States Should Defend Taiwan, National Review, 12/20/21
The U.S. Must Support Ukraine, But China Must Be Our Priority, Time, 02/27/22
Zeitenwende – German Defence Policy in an Era of Great Power Conflict, The Marathon Initiative,
06/21/22
Opinion: To Avert War with China, the U.S. Must Prioritize Taiwan over Ukraine, The Washington Post,
05/18/23
Awards:
Distinguished and Exceptional Public Service Awards, Department of Defense
Superior and Meritorious Honor Awards, Department of State
Be the First to Hear about Upcoming Speakers
The Baltimore Council on Foreign Affairs is purely a local organization in programming, governance and support.
© BCFA All Rights Reserved.
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.