The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02 to 23.11 were approximately: personnel ‒ about 85410 (+410) persons were liquidated, tanks ‒ 2897 (+2), APV ‒ 5832 (+5), artillery systems – 1887 (+5), MLRS – 395 (+0), Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 209 (+0), aircraft – 278 (+0), helicopters –
The Kremlin appears to be setting information conditions for a false-flag attack in Belgorod Oblast, Russia, likely in an effort to regain public support for the war in Ukraine. Kremlin propagandists have begun hypothesizing that Ukrainian forces seek to invade Belgorod Oblast, and other Russian sources noted that Russian forces need
The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02 to 22.11 were approximately: personnel ‒ about 85000 (+400) persons were liquidated, tanks ‒ 2895 (+3), APV ‒ 5827 (+5), artillery systems – 1882 (+12), MLRS – 395 (+2), Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 209 (+0), aircraft – 278 (+0), helicopters –
High-precision attack launched by Russian Aerospace Forces at Motor Sich defence industrial entity has resulted in the destruction of the workshop tasked to assemble engines for Ukrainian Air Force‘s aircraft. In Kupyansk direction, the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) did not conduct any intensive action. ️ Enemy concentration areas were neutralised by artillery and
Two days of shelling caused widespread damage to the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant (ZNPP) on November 20 and 21. The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) stated on November 21 that there are no immediate nuclear safety and security concerns and that the integrity of all six nuclear reactors and the
Russia does not stop striking Ukraine’s industrial facilities, tries to keep the temporarily captured territories, concentrates its efforts on restraining the actions of the Defense Forces, implements equipment in the engineering aspect of the defense line, and continues to conduct offensive actions in certain directions. During the current day, Russian
High-precision attack launched by Russian Aerospace Forces at Motor Sich defence industrial entity has resulted in the destruction of the workshop tasked to assemble engines for Ukrainian Air Force‘s aircraft. In Kupyansk direction, the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) did not conduct any intensive action. ️ Enemy concentration areas were neutralised by artillery and
ISW is publishing an abbreviated campaign update today, November 20. This report discusses the rising influence of the milblogger (military correspondent or voenkor) community in Russia despite its increasingly critical commentary on the conduct of the war. The milblogger community reportedly consists of over 500 independent authors and has emerged as
The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02 to 20.11 were approximately: personnel ‒ about 84210 (+330) persons were liquidated, tanks ‒ 2886 (+1), APV ‒ 5817 (+2), artillery systems – 1868 (+1), MLRS – 393 (+0), Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 209 (+0), aircraft – 278 (+0), helicopters –
This day is coming to an end – already the 270th day of the full-scale war. I will report briefly. The first topic is the frontline. The fiercest battles, as before, are in the Donetsk region. Although there are fewer attacks today due to the deterioration of the weather, the
November 24, 2022
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02 to 23.11 were approximately:
personnel ‒ about 85410 (+410) persons were liquidated,
tanks ‒ 2897 (+2),
APV ‒ 5832 (+5),
artillery systems – 1887 (+5),
MLRS – 395 (+0),
Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 209 (+0),
aircraft – 278 (+0),
helicopters – 261 (+0),
UAV operational-tactical level – 1537 (+0),
cruise missiles ‒ 480 (+0),
warships / boats ‒ 16 (+0),
vehicles and fuel tanks – 4396 (+3),
special equipment ‒ 161 (+0).
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
