The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 14.07.25: personnel: about 1 035 060 (+1 130) personstanks: 11 019 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 987 (+4) artillery systems: 30
Russian officials and milbloggers reiterated complaints about poor security around critical infrastructure in rear areas of Russia in response to a July 13 Ukrainian drone strike against an oil depot
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 13 July 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 13.07.25: personnel: about 1 033 930 (+1 240) persons tanks: 11 016 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 983 (+3)
Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) reportedly conducted successful drone strikes against an oil depot near Tsimlyansk, Rostov Oblast on the morning of July 13. Ukrainian outlet Suspilne reported that its sources stated that SBU
of special military operation as of 12 July 2025 Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range air-based high-precision weapons and drones
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 12.07.25: personnel: about 1 032 690 (+1070) persons tanks: 11 013 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 980 (+1)
Russia launched another large-scale drone and missile strike against Ukraine on the night of July 11 to 12 — the third combined strike with over 500 drones and missiles in
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 5 to 11 July 2025 From 5 to 11 July, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out six
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
