The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 29.06.25: personnel: about 1 020 010 (+1 070) осіб tanks: 10 980 (+4)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 922 (+7) artillery systems: 29
High-ranking Kremlin statements, including from Russian President Vladimir Putin, continue to demonstrate Russia’s wider territorial ambitions in Ukraine beyond Crimea and the four oblasts that Russia has illegally annexed. Russian President
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 29 June 2025 At night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered a mass strike by air-, ground-, and sea-based
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 29.06.25: personnel: about 1 018 940 (+1220) осіб tanks: 10 976 (+6)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 915 (+7) artillery systems: 29 689
Russia conducted its largest combined strike series of the war on the night of June 28 to 29 by launching over 500 missiles and drones against Ukraine. The Ukrainian Air Force
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 28 June 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 28.06.25: personnel: about 1 017 720 (+1 000) осіб tanks: 10 970 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 908 (+12) artillery systems: 29
Ukrainian forces conducted a series of strikes against Russian military infrastructure and defense industrial base (DIB) facilities from June 26 to 28. Ukraine’s Security Service (SBU) reported on June 28 that
Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range air-based high-precision weapons as well as using Kinzhal hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile systems and unmanned
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 27.06.25 personnel – about 1016720 (+970) persons tanks – 10969 (+1) troop-carrying AFVs – 22896 (+4) artillery systems –
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
