Ukraine Military Situation Report | November 26 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Battlefield assessment: Russia poured airborne troops into Pokrovsk, where
Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades, an air assault brigade of the Armed
Data on Russian forces’ rate of advance indicates that a Russian military victory in Ukraine is not inevitable, and a rapid Russian seizure of the rest of Donetsk Oblast is
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 25 November 2025 In response to the terrorist attacks launched by Ukraine against civilian objects on the territory of Russia,
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 25.11.25: personnel: about 1 167 570 (+1 120) personstanks: 11 368 (+2)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 624 (+4)artillery systems: 34 644
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on units of a mechanised brigade, an assault regiment
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 24.11.25: personnel: about 1 166 450 (+1 190) personstanks: 11 366 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 620 (+5)artillery systems: 34 626
US and Ukrainian delegations reportedly narrowed down the initial US-proposed 28-point peace plan to 19 points.[1] An official briefed on the negotiations told the Washington Post that the peace plan to end Russia’s
US and Ukrainian officials indicated that the initially reported US-proposed 28-point peace plan is not final and is currently undergoing changes. US President Donald Trump stated on November 22 that the
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 23 November 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
