Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation from 12 to 18 April 2025 From 12 to 18 April 2025, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered nine group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.04.25: personnel: about 938 970 (+1 530) persons tanks: 10 662 (+8)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 257 (+40)artillery systems: 26 530
Russian Permanent Representative to the United Nations (UN) Vasily Nebenzya reiterated Russian President Vladimir Putin’s rejection of a general ceasefire in Ukraine. Nebenzya claimed on April 18 that discussing a general
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 17 April 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, units of the
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.04.25: personnel: about 937 440 (+1 230) persons tanks: 10 654 (+16) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 217
Russian officials continue to reiterate Russian President Vladimir Putin’s non-negotiable demands for extensive territorial concessions from Ukraine while noting that ongoing peace negotiations are unlikely to achieve results quickly. Kremlin Spokesperson
Institute for the Study of War: U.S. tells Russia no economic deal without cease-fire in Ukraine The White House reiterated that the United States will not engage in economic agreements
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.04.25: personnel: about 936 210 (+1 050) personstanks: 10 638 (+9)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 163 (+13)artillery systems: 26 377 (+87) MLRS:
The White House reiterated that the United States will not engage in economic agreements with Russia until Russia agrees to a ceasefire, amid continued Russian efforts to deflect blame onto
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 14.04.25: personnel: about 933 980 (+1 310) personstanks: 10 622 (+19)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 130 (+42)artillery systems: 26 222 (+59) MLRS:
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
