The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.11.25: personnel: about 1 165 260 (+920) personstanks: 11 363 (+2)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 615 (+8)artillery systems: 34 585 (+26)
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 22 November 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Sever Group’s units inflicted fire
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 22.11.25: personnel: about 1 164 340 (+1 170) persons tanks: 11 361 (+4) troop-carrying
Russian officials and state media continue to set information conditions to reject the US-proposed 28-point peace plan, indicating that the Kremlin is actively conditioning the Russian people to not accept
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation (15–21 November 2025 In response to terrorist attacks launched by Ukraine against civilian facilities in Russia from 15 to 21 November, the
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 21.11.25: personnel: about 1 163 170 (+1 050) persons tanks: 11 357 (+0) troop-carrying
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.11.25: personnel: about 1 162 120 (+890) personstanks: 11 357 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 597 (+2)artillery systems: 34 530 (+19)MLRS:
All available reporting continues to indicate that the stipulations of the reported 28-point Russia-US peace plan amount to Ukraine’s full capitulation to Russia’s original war demands. Western media outlets and
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 19 November 2025 In response to Ukraine’s terrorist attacks against civilian facilities in Russia this morning, the Armed Forces of
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
