Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff:  About 1,530 Russian battle casualties in the past day; 64 Russian tanks and APC’s were destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.10.24 personnel ‒ about 675800 (+1530) persons, tanks ‒ 9027 (+13), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 18053 (+51), artillery systems – 19533 (+23), MLRS – 1232 (+0), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 978 (+0), aircraft – 369(+0), helicopters – 329 (+0), UAV operational-tactical

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense:  Up to 1,820 Ukrainian casualties in 24 hours

The units of the Sever Group of Forces in Liptsy and Volchansk directions have engaged the 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade and the 92nd Air Assault Brigade of the AFU close to Liptsy, Bolshiye Prokhody, and Malye Prokhody (Kharkov region). The AFU losses were up to 40 troops and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers. One UAV depot has been neutralised. As a

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense:  Up to 2,160 Ukrainian battle casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Liptsy and Volchansk directions, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade, 92nd Air Assault Brigade of the AFU, and 125th Territorial Defence Brigade near Liptsy, Russkaya Lozovaya, and Volchanskiye Khutora (Kharkov region). The AFU

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: About 1,420 Russian battle casualties in the past day; 50 Russian tanks or APC’s destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.10.24 personnel ‒ about 674270 (+1420) persons, tanks ‒ 9014 (+17), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 18002 (+33), artillery systems – 19510 (+51), MLRS – 1232 (+1), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 978 (+0), aircraft – 369(+0), helicopters – 329 (+0), UAV operational-tactical

Read More »

October 19, 2024

Institute for the Study of War: Ukrainian drone strikes Russian microelectronics plant 

Institute for the Study of War

Ukrainian drones reportedly struck the “Kremniy El” microelectronic plant in Bryansk City on the night of October 18 to 19. Russian opposition outlet Astra reported on October 19 that Ukrainian drones struck the plant and noted that “Kremniy El” is one of Russia’s largest microelectronic manufacturers and that the Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) is one of the company’s main customers. Head of the Ukrainian Center for Countering Disinformation Lieutenant Andriy Kovalenko acknowledged the report of the strike and stated that the plant manufactures microelectronics for Russian Pantsir air defense systems, Iskander missiles, radars, electronic warfare (EW) systems, and drones. Ukrainian outlet RBC Ukraine and Ukrainian open-source intelligence group CyberBoroshno published photos showing the aftermath of the strike and damage to a building at the plant. Bryansk Oblast Governor Alexander Bogomaz claimed on October 19 that debris from a downed Ukrainian drone struck and caused a fire at a “non-residential building” in Bryansk Oblast, possibly referring to the plant.

Ukraine and Russia conducted a one-for-one prisoner of war (POW) exchange on October 18 – the fourth exchange since the start of Ukrainian operations in Kursk Oblast in August 2024. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced on October 19 that Ukraine returned 95 POWs, including Ukrainian servicemembers who defended the Azovstal Steel Plant in Mariupol in early 2022, Ukrainian National Guardsmen, servicemembers of the Ukrainian State Border Service, and other Ukrainian military personnel. The Russian MoD claimed on October 18 that Russian authorities also returned 95 Russian POWs and that the United Arab Emirates (UAE) mediated the exchange. The Ukrainian Coordination Headquarters for the Treatment of POWs noted that many of the returned Ukrainian POWs had serious illnesses and severe injuries and experienced weight loss due to torture and malnutrition in Russian captivity.  ISW previously observed that the frequency of POW exchanges between Ukraine and Russia has significantly increased since the start of the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk Oblast on August 6, with both sides exchanging a total of 267 POWs each in three separate exchanges prior to the most recent October 18 POW exchange. Russia and Ukraine only conducted three POW exchanges between January 1 and August 6, 2024, in comparison. ISW continues to assess that the Ukrainian incursion into Kursk Oblast has likely increasingly incentivized Russia to engage in POW exchanges.

Key Takeaways:

  • Ukrainian drones reportedly struck the “Kremniy El” microelectronic plant in Bryansk City on the night of October 18 to 19.
  • Ukraine and Russia conducted a one-for-one prisoner of war (POW) exchange on October 18 – the fourth exchange since the start of Ukrainian operations in Kursk Oblast in August 2024.
  • Ukraine’s Prosecutor General’s Office reported on October 18 that Ukrainian authorities opened an investigation into the execution of a Ukrainian prisoner of war (POW) in Bakhmut Raion in September 2024.
  • Russian forces recently advanced within the main Ukrainian salient in Kursk oblast and near Toretsk, Pokrovsk, and Donetsk City.

(For full report: https://www.understandingwar.org/backgrounder/russian-offensive-campaign-assessment-october-19-2024    )

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.