The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.11.24: personnel: about 720 880 (+1 640) personstanks: 9 350 (+12)troop-carrying AFVs: 19 021 (+27)artillery systems: 20 556 (+36)MLRS: 1 252 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 999 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 18 974 (+60)cruise missiles: 2 641 (+0)warships /
The New York Times (NYT) and Washington Post reported that US President Joe Biden has authorized Ukrainian forces to use US-provided ATACMS in limited strikes against Russian and North Korean military targets within Kursk Oblast. The NYT andWashington Post reported on November 17 that unspecified US officials expect Ukrainian forces to initially conduct strikes against Russian
defeated formations of foreign mercenaries, manpower, and hardware of 122nd and 125th territorial defence brigades near Veliky Burluk, Malye Prokhody, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses were up to 70 troops, four 152-mm D-20 howitzers, and three 122-mm D-30 howitzers. Two ammunition depots have been wiped out. The units of the Zapad Group of Forces have taken more advantageous lines and positions. Russian troops
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.11.24: personnel: about 719 240 (+1 650) personstanks: 9 338 (+8)troop-carrying AFVs: 18 994 (+26)artillery systems: 20 520 (+28)MLRS: 1 252 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 999 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 18 914 (+28)cruise missiles: 2 641 (+0)warships /
Ukrainian drone operations continue to play a critical role in constraining Russian mechanized maneuver and preventing Russian forces from fully exploiting Ukraine’s ongoing manpower constraints. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated during an interview with Ukrainian media published on November 16 that Russian forces are currently advancing along the frontline due in
Dr. Robert O. Freedman Johns Hopkins University October 7, 2023, when Hamas launched a brutal surprise attack on Israel, killing 1200 Israelis, raping Israeli women and taking more than 200 Israelis hostage was a major turning point in Israeli domestic politics and foreign policy—or was it? After more than
From 9 to 15 November, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have launched 42 group strikes by high-precision weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles, which hit power industry facilities used to support Ukrainian defence industry enterprises, the infrastructure of military airfields, the Sapsan operational-tactical missile manufacturing shops, assembly and storage areas of attack
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 14.11.24: personnel: about 716 070 (+1 690) personstanks: 9 319 (+19)troop-carrying AFVs: 18 947 (+19)artillery systems: 20 472 (+64)MLRS: 1 252 (+3)anti-aircraft systems: 997 (+1)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 18 852 (+54)cruise missiles: 2 640 (+4)warships /
The Kremlin is intensifying its reflexive control campaign aimed at influencing Western decision-making in Russia’s favor ahead of or in lieu of possible future negotiations about the resolution of the war in Ukraine. Russian President Vladimir Putin had a phone call with German Chancellor Olaf Scholz on November 15 and reiterated
In Kharkov direction, the Sever Group of Forces engaged formations of 113th, 120th territorial defence brigades, and 5th border detachment of the Ukrainian border police near Udy, Vilcha, Krasnokutsk, Odnorobovka, and Liptsy (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 110 troops, three motor vehicles, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers. One UAV workshop was destroyed. The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and
November 17, 2024
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.11.24:
personnel: about 720 880 (+1 640) persons
tanks: 9 350 (+12)
troop-carrying AFVs: 19 021 (+27)
artillery systems: 20 556 (+36)
MLRS: 1 252 (+0)
anti-aircraft systems: 999 (+0)
aircraft: 369 (+0)
helicopters: 329 (+0)
UAVs operational-tactical level: 18 974 (+60)
cruise missiles: 2 641 (+0)
warships / boats: 28 (+0)
submarines: 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks: 29 321 (+85)
special equipment: 3 653 (+2)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
