The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.08.24personnel ‒ about 605330 (+1190) persons tanks ‒ 8533 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16599 (+32) artillery systems – 17307 (+45) MLRS – 1167 (+1) anti-aircraft systems ‒ 932 (+1) aircraft – 367 (+0) helicopters – 328 (+0) UAV operational-tactical
From 17 to 23 August 2024, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out 16 group strikes by high-precision weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles against airfield infrastructure, depots storing ammunition and missile and artillery munitions, repair facilities for AFU weapons and military hardware as well as hangars for storing
The Russian military command recently redeployed elements of at least one Russian airborne (VDV) regiment from western Zaporizhia Oblast in response to Ukraine’s incursion into Kursk Oblast, possibly in an effort to stabilize the lines and improve command and control (C2) over Russian conscripts. A Crimean occupation official, who had volunteered
The estimated cumulative enemy combat losses from 24.02.22 to 20.08.24:personnel: about 604140 (+1130) personstanks: 8529 (+7)troop-carrying AFVs: 16567 (+25)artillery systems: 17262 (+46)MLRS: 1166 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 931 (+3)aircraft: 367 (+0)helicopters: 328 (+0)UAV operational-tactical level: 13998 (+96)cruise missiles: 2443 (+1)warships/ boats: 28 (+0)submarines: 1 (+0)vehicles and fuel tanks – 23280 (+59)special equipment: 2904 (+17)
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Liptsy and Volchansk directions, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on units of the AFU 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade, 92nd Assault Brigade, and 36th Marine Brigade near Glubokoye, Lipsy, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 80 Ukrainian troops, one MLRS
Killing of Civilian, Mass Arson, Unlawful Recruitment in Rakhine State Human Rights Watch: August 12, 2024 A family who fled from Buthidaung, Myanmar, at a refugee camp in Cox’s Bazar, Bangladesh, June 25, 2024. © 2024 Mohammad Ponir (Bangkok) – Myanmar junta forces and the opposition Arakan Army have committed
The Kremlin appears to have launched an intricate messaging campaign aimed at justifying to its domestic audience why Russia is prioritizing maintaining the initiative in eastern Ukraine over immediately expelling Ukrainian forces from Kursk Oblast. Russian government sources close to the Russian Presidential Administration told Russian independent outlet Meduza that the
Ukraine Military Situation Report | August 21 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the war in Ukraine. Executive Summary — The Ukrainian military continues to gain territory and capture Russian troops in its Kursk offensive. — Ukraine now controls more than 80 villages and towns in
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 21.08.24 personnel ‒ about 603010 (+1210) persons, tanks ‒ 8522 (+4), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16542 (+21), artillery systems – 17216 (+60), MLRS – 1166 (+0), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 928 (+2), aircraft – 367 (+0), helicopters – 328 (+0), UAV
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The units of the Sever Group of Forces in Volchansk and Liptsy directions have engaged 43rd mechanised and 92nd assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the 36th Marine Brigade, and the 13th National Guard Brigade near Zolochyov, Liptsy, and
August 23, 2024
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.08.24
personnel ‒ about 605330 (+1190) persons
tanks ‒ 8533 (+4)
troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16599 (+32)
artillery systems – 17307 (+45)
MLRS – 1167 (+1)
anti-aircraft systems ‒ 932 (+1)
aircraft – 367 (+0)
helicopters – 328 (+0)
UAV operational-tactical level – 14025 (+27)
cruise missiles ‒ 2442 (+0)
warships / boats ‒ 28 (+0)
submarines – 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks – 23329 (+49)
special equipment ‒ 2910 (+6)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
