The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 15.08.24 personnel ‒ about 595620 (+1220) persons, tanks ‒ 8484 (+8), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16426 (+24), artillery systems – 16868 (+47), MLRS – 1154 (+3), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 922 (+1), aircraft – 367 (+1), helicopters – 328 (+0), UAV
️The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to repel the AFU attempt to invade the territory of the Russian Federation Active actions of the Sever Group of Forces, Army Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, and artillery strikes prevented enemy mobile armoured groups from getting into the depth of the Russian Territory near
Russian milbloggers claimed that Ukrainian forces marginally advanced in Kursk Oblast amid a generally slower tempo of Ukrainian operations as Russian forces continue attempts to stabilize the frontline in the area. Ukrainian outlet Suspilne reported on August 14 that its sources in the Ukrainian military stated that the tempo of Ukrainian advances in
The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 14.08.24 were approximately: personnel ‒ about 594400 (+1240) persons, tanks ‒ 8476 (+21), APV ‒ 16402 (+17), artillery systems – 16821 (+57), РСЗВ / MLRS – 1151 (+5), Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 921 (+1), aircraft – 366 (+0), helicopters –
️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to repel the AFU attempt to invade the territory of the Russian Federation. Over the past 24 hours, active actions of the Sever Group of Forces and arrived reserves, army aviation and unmanned aerial vehicles, and artillery fire prevented enemy mobile armoured
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and other senior Ukrainian officials provided updates about the ongoing Ukrainian incursion into Kursk Oblast and outlined several Ukrainian objectives of the operations in the area. Zelensky stated on August 3 that Ukrainian forces “control” 74 localities in Kursk Oblast. It is unclear if Zelensky meant that Ukrainian
The total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 13.08.24 were approximately: personnel ‒ about 593160 (+1160) persons, tanks ‒ 8455 (+5), APV ‒ 16385 (+17), artillery systems – 16764 (+36), MLRS – 1146 (+0), Anti-aircraft warfare systems ‒ 920 (+1), aircraft – 366 (+0), helicopters – 328 (+0),
We Have Proven Once Again That Ukrainians Are Capable of Achieving Their Goals in Any Situation – Address by the President 13 August 2024 I wish you good health, fellow Ukrainians! Today, there have already been several reports from Commander-in-Chief Syrskyi about the situation on the front and in the
️The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue to repel the AFU attempt to invade the territory of the Russian Federation Over the past 24 hours, active actions of units of the Sever Group of Forces and arrived reserves, Army Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, and artillery strikes repelled seven attacks launched by
Ukrainian forces appear to be advancing further within Kursk Oblast despite recent milblogger claims that Russian forces were stabilizing the frontline in Kursk Oblast. Russian milbloggers claimed on August 11 that Ukrainian offensive activity decreased in Kursk Oblast; however, a prominent Kremlin-affiliated milblogger refuted these claims on August 12 and noted
August 15, 2024
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 15.08.24
personnel ‒ about 595620 (+1220) persons,
tanks ‒ 8484 (+8),
troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16426 (+24),
artillery systems – 16868 (+47),
MLRS – 1154 (+3),
anti-aircraft systems ‒ 922 (+1),
aircraft – 367 (+1),
helicopters – 328 (+0),
UAV operational-tactical level – 13598 (+50),
cruise missiles ‒ 2428 (+2),
warships / boats ‒ 28 (+0),
submarines – 1 (+0),
vehicles and fuel tanks – 22775 (+65),
special equipment ‒ 2813 (+0)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
