Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff: About 1,630 Russian casualties in the past day; 40 Russian tanks or personnel carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 25.10.24 personnel ‒ about 685910 (+1630) persons, tanks ‒ 9097 (+7), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 18287 (+33), artillery systems – 19753 (+34), MLRS – 1238 (+2), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 982 (+1), aircraft – 369(+0), helicopters – 329 (+0), UAV operational-tactical

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:  ABout 1,240 Russian casualties in the past day; 27 Russian tanks and personnel carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 24.10.24: personnel: about 684 280 (+1 240) personstanks: 9 090 (+2)troop-carrying AFVs: 18 254 (+25) artillery systems: 19 719 (+45)MLRS: 1 236 (+2)anti-aircraft systems: 981 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 17 597 (+108)cruise missiles: 2 625 (+0)warships / boats: 28 (+0)submarines: 1 (+0)vehicles and fuel tanks: 27 286 (+69)special equipment: 3

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 2,065 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The Sever Group of Forces in Kharkov direction engaged formations of AFU 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade and 92nd Air Assault Brigade near Liptsy, Kotovka, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 100 troops, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer.  The Zapad Group of Forces improved

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:  About 1,460 Russian battlefield casualties in the past day; 39 Russian tanks and troop carriers destroyed  or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.10.24 personnel ‒ about 683040 (+1460) persons, tanks ‒ 9088 (+9), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 18229 (+30), artillery systems – 19674 (+51), MLRS – 1234 (+0), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 981 (+0), aircraft – 369(+0), helicopters – 329 (+0), UAV operational-tactical

Read More »

October 25, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 12,500 Ukrainian casualties from Oct 19-25; One Ukrainian MiG aircraft shot down

Russian Defense Ministry

From 19 to 25 October, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have carried out 42 group strikes by high-precision weapons as well as attack drones to hit the oil-gas and energy enterprises which supported Ukrainian defence industry, as well as infrastructure of military airfields, production workshops and storage areas of unmanned aerial vehicles.

In addition, ammunition depots, fuel facilities, temporary deployment areas of AFU troops, nationalist formations, and foreign mercenaries were hit.

▫️ Over the past week, the Sever Group of Forces has been eliminating the AFU formations in Kursk region.

Strikes by aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, and artillery inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of a tank brigade, six mechanised brigades, three airborne assault brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a marine brigade, four territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades.

 In Kharkov direction, formations of an AFU motorised infantry brigade, airborne assault brigade, and two territorial defence brigades were hit.

During the week in the Sever Group of Forces area of responsibility, the enemy suffered losses of over 2,720 troops, 10 tanks, and 74 armoured fighting vehicles, including four Bradley infantry fighting vehicles, and two M113 armoured personnel carriers made in the USA. Russian units destroyed 47 field artillery guns, 42 motor vehicles, 11 electronic warfare and counter-battery stations, as well as four field ammunition depots.

▫️The Zapad Group of Forces liberated Novosadovoye of the Donetsk People’s Republic.

Russian units hit manpower and materiel of a tank brigade, seven mechanised brigades, an assault brigade, an airmobile brigade of the AFU, and a territorial defence brigade

Twenty counter-attacks launched by the AFU assault detachments were repelled.

The enemy’s losses amounted to up to 3,180 troops, a tank11 armoured fighting vehicles, including four U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, 28 motor vehicles, and 30 field artillery guns, 19 of which were manufactured by NATO countries. Six electronic and counter-battery warfare stations and eight field ammunition depots were eliminated.

▫️ The Yug Group of Forces continued to advance into the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated Zoryanoye and Serebryanka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Russian units engaged five mechanised brigades, two motorised rifle brigades, two infantry brigades, an assault brigade, a mountain assault brigade, an air assault brigade, two airmobile brigades of the AFU, territorial defence brigades, and national guard brigades. Eleven counter-attacks launched by AFU assault detachments were thwarted.

The enemy losses amounted to more than 5,410 troops, a tank, seven armoured fighting vehicles, including three U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, 45 motor vehicles, and 37 field artillery guns, 13 of which were Western-made. Five electronic warfare stations and eleven field ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️The Tsentr Group of Forces liberated Nikolayevka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Russian units hit manpower and materiel of six mechanised brigades, a motorised infantry brigade, two infantry brigades, a jaeger brigade, an airborne brigade, an air assault brigade of the AFU, two marine brigades, two territorial defence brigades, two formations of the National Guard, and the Lyut Assault Brigade of the National Police of Ukraine.

In addition, 72 enemy counter-attacks were repelled.

Over the past week, the losses of Ukrainian armed groups in this area amounted to 3,130 troops, 28 armoured fighting vehicles, including a French-made VAB APCs, as well as United States-made: four Bradley IFVs, seven M113 and M1117 APCs, and two HMMWV armoured fighting vehicles. In addition, 35 field artillery guns and 23 motor vehicles were neutralised.

▫️The Vostok Group of Forces captured more advantageous lines and positions. Russian units engaged formations of a mechanised brigade, a motorised infantry brigade, and three territorial defence brigades, a national guard brigade.

The enemy lost up to 750 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 21 motor vehicles, and 16 field artillery guns, including 13 155-mm self-propelled artillery systems and howitzers made by NATO countries.

▫️ The Dnepr Group of Forces engaged the manpower and hardware of the three mechanised brigades, an infantry brigade, a mountain assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, two marine brigades, three territorial defence brigades, and a national guard brigade.

The enemy’s losses amounted to up to 440 troops, 37 motor vehicles, and nine field artillery guns. One German-made IRIS-T anti-aircraft missile launcher and seven field ammunition depots were neutralised.

▫️ Russian Aerospace Forces shot down one MiG-29 aircraft of Ukrainian Air Force.

Air defence units shot down three French-made Hammer guided aerial bombs, 39 U.S.-made HIMARS projectiles, and 521 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles during the week.

▫️ During the week, 55 Ukrainian servicemen surrendered, including 39 servicemen on the line of contact in Kursk region.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 647 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 34,304 unmanned aerial vehicles, 584 anti-aircraft missile systems, 18,871 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,478 MLRS combat vehicles, 16,761 field artillery guns and mortars, and 27,598 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.