Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Institute for the Study of War: North Korean troops reported in occupied Mariupol

The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) likely attempted to cover up the recent removal of the acting commander of the Southern Military District (SMD) Colonel General Gennady Anashkin following widespread accusations within the Russian information space that Anashkin’s subordinates submitted false frontline progress reports to superiors. Russian milbloggers widely claimed on

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 13,860 Ukrainian casualties from Nov 26 to 22

From 16 to 22 November 2024, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a massed and 30 group strikes with high-precision weapons, including the strike by the Kinzhal hypersonic air-launched ballistic missile as well as with strike drones.  As a result, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation hit  important facilities of the Ukrainian defence industry, energy facilities

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: about 1,050 Russian casualties in the past day; 14 Russian tanks and APC’s destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 22.11.24: personnel: about 728 300 (+1 050) personstanks: 9 399 (+1) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 156 (+13)artillery systems: 20 736 (+5)MLRS: 1 254 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 004 (+1)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 19 260 (+1)cruise missiles:  2 764 (+8)warships

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,620 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

ebedevka and Kazachya Lopan (Kharkov region). The AFU losses were up to 145 troops, two tanks, 11 armoured fighting vehicles, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer. The units of the Zapad Group of Forces have improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of 28th, 63rd, 116th mechanised brigades and the 119th territorial defence brigades of the AFU near Kupyansk, Zagryzovo,

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War: More nuclear saber-rattling by Putin as Russian forces fire ballistic missiles into Ukraine

Russian President Vladimir Putin intensified his reflexive control campaign aimed at Ukraine and its Western partners by conducting an ostentatious ballistic missile strike against Ukraine that used multiple reentry vehicles on November 21. Russian forces conducted a complex strike against critical infrastructure and industrial enterprises in Dnipro City, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, on

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,690 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the AFU 95th Air Assault Brigade and 22nd Mechanised Brigade near Liptsy, Borshchevaya, Chernoglazovka, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). One counter-attack launched by the AFU 92nd Assault Brigade was repelled. The AFU losses

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: about 1,690 Russian casualties in the past day; 35 Russian tanks and personnel carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.11.24: personnel: about 725 740 (+1 690) personstanks: 9 390 (+8) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 119 (+27)artillery systems: 20 681 (+49)MLRS: 1 252 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 001 (+2)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 19 202 (+91)cruise missiles:  2 756 (+2)warships

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War: Ukraine launches long range strikes into Russia

Ukraine conducted a successful combined strike against military assets in the Russian rear on the night of November 19 to 20 using drones and Western-provided long-range weapons. The Guardian and Bloomberg both reported on November 20, citing anonymous sources, that Ukrainian forces have conducted the first strikes against military targets within Russia using UK-provided

Read More »

November 23, 2024

Institute for the Study of War: North Korean troops reported in occupied Mariupol

Institute for the Study of War

The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) likely attempted to cover up the recent removal of the acting commander of the Southern Military District (SMD) Colonel General Gennady Anashkin following widespread accusations within the Russian information space that Anashkin’s subordinates submitted false frontline progress reports to superiors. Russian milbloggers widely claimed on November 23 that the Russian military command removed Anashkin, the acting commander of the SMD and commander of the Russian Southern Grouping of Forces, after Russian commanders in the Siversk direction in his area of responsibility submitted incorrect reports about Russian battlefield advances to their superiors.[1] Russian state outlet RBK reported that a source in the Russian MoD acknowledged Anashkin’s dismissal but claimed that it was due to a “planned rotation” and praised Anashkin’s military achievements.[2] Russian milbloggers widely applauded Anashkin’s removal, claiming that this may lead to improvements in how Russian forces plan and conduct operations and may increase the value Russian commanders place on Russian soldiers’ lives at the front.[3] One milblogger claimed that Anashkin’s removal shows that Russian Defense Minister Andrei Belousov is starting to get involved in “military management” and not just administrative and economic reforms within the MoD.[4] Russian milbloggers recently claimed that Russian authorities arrested the commander of the 3rd Combined Arms Army (CAA), the 3rd CAA’s chief of staff, and the commander of the 3rd CAA’s 7th Motorized Rifle Brigade for submitting incorrect reports about Russian advances in the Siversk direction, and Russian milbloggers have widely complained in recent weeks about the pervasive Russian military culture of exaggerating battlefield successes near Siversk.[5] The Russian MoD falsely claimed that Russian forces in the Siversk direction seized Bilhorivka on May 20 and Serebryanka in late October 2024, for example, despite Russian milblogger criticisms of these claims since.[6]

Ukrainian military officials denied claims of North Korean personnel’s presence in Kharkiv Oblast amid new unconfirmed reports that North Korean “technical advisers” are operating in occupied Mariupol.CNN, citing an anonymous Ukrainian security source reported on November 22 that North Korean technical advisers have arrived in Russian-occupied Mariupol, are performing support operations, and are detached from the Russian military units despite wearing Russian military uniforms. Ukrainian military officials also reportedly told CNN that radio intercepts suggest that North Korean troops are operating in Kharkiv Oblast and that North Korean troops are waiting for worsening weather conditions to conduct assault operations.[7] The Ukrainian Kharkiv Group of Forces denied reports of the presence of North Korean personnel in Kharkiv Oblast and stated that the spokesperson cited in the CNN report is not an official Kharkiv Group of Forces spokesperson and commented on the situation outside of their responsibilities.[8]Reutersreported on November 23 that a large number of the 11,000 North Korean troops in Kursk Oblast are still finishing military training.[9]

Key Takeaways:

  • The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) likely attempted to cover up the recent removal of the acting commander of the Southern Military District (SMD) Colonel General Gennady Anashkin following widespread accusations within the Russian information space that Anashkin’s subordinates submitted false frontline progress reports to superiors.
  • Ukrainian military officials denied claims of North Korean personnel’s presence in Kharkiv Oblast amid new unconfirmed reports that North Korean “technical advisers” are operating in occupied Mariupol.
  • Russian forces recently advanced in Kursk Oblast and near Velyka Novosilka. 
  • Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated that Russia does not currently need to conduct another partial involuntary reserve callup as Russian authorities continue leaning into crypto-mobilization efforts.
Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.