Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff: approximately 1,610 Russian casualties in the past day; 32 Russian tanks or troop carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 31.12.24:  personnel: about  789 550 (+1 610) persons   tanks: 9 668 (+5) troop-carrying AFVs: 20 030 (+27) artillery systems: 21 528 (+34)MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 21081 (+12)cruise missiles: 3 003 (+0)warships/boats:

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: Up to 1,560 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of two territorial defence brigades near Kazachaya Lopan, Velikiye Prokhody, and Liptsy (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 65 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, one motor vehicle, one 152-mm D-20 gun, two 122-mm D-30 howitzers, and one electronic warfare station. Units

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:  About 2,010 Russian casualties in the past day; 29 Russian tanks and Armored personnel carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 30.12.24:  personnel: about  787 940 (+ 2 010) persons   tanks: 9 663 (+7) troop-carrying AFVs: 20 003 (+22) artillery systems: 21 494 (+44)MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 21 069 (+31)cruise missiles: 3

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War: Lavrov demands Ukraine give up its right to sovereignty as a precondition for peace talks

Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reiterated Russia’s demand that Ukraine renounce its right to sovereignty and territorial integrity as a precondition to start peace talks, indicating that Russia is not interested in good faith negotiations. Lavrov stated in an interview with Kremlin newswire TASS published on December 30 that Russia will not participate

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,400 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, the Sever Group of Forces hit formations of a mechanised brigade of the AFU and a territorial defence brigade close to Volchansk and Tikhoye (Kharkov region). The enemy lost up to 40 troops, a motor vehicle, a 152-mm D-20 gun, a 152-mm Giatsint-S gun, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers. One electronic warfare

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: Up to 1,470 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade, one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and formations of foreign mercenaries near Volchansk, Liptsy, Slatino, and Neskuchnoye (Kharkov region).

Read More »

December 31, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 1,495 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

This morning, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike by high-precision weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles against the infrastructure of a military airfield and the Ukrainian defence industry enterprises which manufacture gunpowder for the needs of the AFU. The goal of the strike has been achieved. All the targets have been engaged.

▫️In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces defeated units of two territorial defence brigades close to Volchansk and Liptsy (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses were up to 35 troops, one motor vehicle, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer.

▫️The Zapad Group of Forces’ units improved the situation along the front line,inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one tank brigade, one mechanised brigade, three territorial defence brigades, and one national guard brigade close to Dvurechnaya, Zapadnoye, Kovsharovka (Kharkov region), Ivanovka, Torskoye, and Terny (Donetsk People’s Republic).

One counter-attack launched by an AFU assault detachment was repelled. 

The AFU losses were more than 440 troops, three U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, six pickup trucks, one UK-made 155-mm towed FH-70 howitzer, one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system, one U.S.-made 105-mm M119 gun, and two ammunition depots.

▫️Units of the Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and inflicted losses on formations of three mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, and one airmobile brigade of the AFU near Dalneye, Chasov Yar, Kurakhovo, and Yantarnoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses were more than 290 troops, two infantry fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, one UK-made Saxon armoured personnel carrier, one Kozak armoured fighting vehicle, two pickup trucks, and one U.S.-made 105-mm M119 MLRS gun.

▫️The Tsentr Group of Forces’ units continued advancing into the depths of enemy defences and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two mechanised brigades, one motorised infantry brigade, one mountain assault brigade as well as one marine brigade and one assault brigade of the National Police of Ukraine near Dzerzhinsk, Shcherbinovka, Shevchenko, Dachenskoye and Peschanoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

In addition, 12 counter-attacks launched by AFU formations were repelled. 

The AFU losses were up to 505 troops, one German-made Leopard tank, one infantry fighting vehicle, two U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, five motor vehicles,including three Turkish-made Kirpione UK-made Snatch, and one Kozak combat vehicles, five motor vehicles, one 152-mm Msta-B howitzer, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers.

▫️Units of the Vostok Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and defeated formations of one mechanised brigade, two territorial defence brigades close to Bogatyr, Razliv, and Ravnopol (Donetsk People’s Republic).

Two counter-attacks launched by enemy assault detachments were repelled.

The AFU losses were more than 160 troops, one tank, three motor vehicles, one 155-mm Bogdana self-propelled artillery system, one 122-mm D-30 howitzer, and one 122-mm Gvozdika self-propelled artillery system.

One electronic warfare station was eliminated.

▫️Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces engaged manpower and hardware of two territorial defence brigades close to Antonovka and Ponyatovka (Kherson region).

The AFU losses were up to 65 troops, six motor vehicles, and two field ammunition depots.

▫️Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces engaged a military enterprise that manufactured ammunition, storage depots for strike drones as well as clusters of AFU manpower and military hardware in 138 areas during the day.

▫️Air defence facilities shot down two Hammer guided aerial bombs, seven U.S.-made HIMARS MLRS projectiles, and 103 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles, 68 of them out of the special military operation area.

▫️The Black Sea Fleet destroyed eight uncrewed surface vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 650 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 38,981 unmanned aerial vehicles, 590 anti-aircraft missile systems, 20,120 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,504 MLRS combat vehicles, 20,104 field artillery guns and mortars, and 29,667 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.