The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 28.12.24: personnel: about 784 200 (+ 1 690) persons tanks: 9 651 (+7) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 970 (+19) artillery systems: 21 408 (+29)MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 21 013 (+14)cruise missiles: 3
Russian President Vladimir Putin appears to be trying to smooth over possible tensions in the Russian-Azerbaijani and Russian-Kazakh relationships after Russian air defense likely shot an Azerbaijan Airlines passenger plane on December 25, causing it to crash in Kazakhstan. Putin called Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev about the December 25 crash on
From 21 to 27 December 2024, the Russian Armed Forces delivered one mass and 37 group strikes by precision weaponry and unmanned aerial vehicles, thus inflicting fire damage on energy facilities that ensured operation of Ukrainian defence industry enterprises, infrastructure of military airfields, ammunition depots, POL bases, workshops, storage areas, UAV launch sites, and UAV training centres. Temporary deployment
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 27.12.24: personnel: about 782 510 (+ 1 650) persons tanks: 9 644 (+14) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 951 (+18) artillery systems: 21 379 (+22)MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+1)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 20 999 (+28)cruise missiles: 3
on formations of one motorised infantry brigade of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades near Malye Prokhody and Volchanskye Khutora (Kharkov region). One counter-attack launched by an AFU assault detachment was repelled. The AFU losses amounted to more than 35 troops, two motor vehicles, and one 122-mm D-30 howitzer. Three electronic warfare stations were destroyed. Units of the Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 26.12.24: personnel: about 780 860 (+ 1 540) persons tanks: 9 630 (+2) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 933 (+10) artillery systems: 21 357 (+24)MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 031 (+1)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 20 971 (+63)cruise missiles: 3
Russian President Vladimir Putin explicitly rejected a suggestion reportedly considered by US President-elect Donald Trump’s team in early November 2024 that would delay Ukraine’s membership in NATO for at least a decade as a condition for ending the war in Ukraine. Putin responded on December 26 to a journalist’s request to
This morning, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered a mass strike by long-range precision weaponry and attack drones at critical power infrastructure facilities ensuring operation of Ukrainian defence industry enterprises. The goal of the strike has been achieved. All the targets have been engaged. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 25.12.24: personnel: about 779 320 (+ 1 600) persons tanks: 9 628 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 923 (+8) artillery systems: 21 333 (+10)MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 030 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 329 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 20 908 (+74)cruise missiles:
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces defeated armed formations of one mechanised brigade of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Liptsy and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 40 troops, three motor vehicles, and four 122-mm D-30 howitzers. The Zapad Group of
December 28, 2024
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 28.12.24:
personnel: about 784 200 (+ 1 690) persons
tanks: 9 651 (+7)
troop-carrying AFVs: 19 970 (+19)
artillery systems: 21 408 (+29)
MLRS: 1 256 (+0)
anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+0)
aircraft: 369 (+0)
helicopters: 329 (+0)
UAVs operational-tactical level: 21 013 (+14)
cruise missiles: 3 003 (+0)
warships/boats: 28 (+0)
submarines: 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks: 32 328 (+66)
special equipment: 3 668 (+0)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
