Report from the National Unity Government Ministry of Human Rights
Military Junta Launches Airstrike on Singwat Village, Myingya Township, Mandalay Region
Report from the National Unity Government Ministry of Human Rights
January 31, 2025
The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
Report from the National Unity Government Ministry of Human Rights
© UNICEF/Patrick Brown A child at an internally displaced persons (IDP) centre in Myanmar. By Vibhu Mishra 22 January 2025 The security situation in Myanmar continues to remain highly volatile, with intensified airstrikes across multiple regions leading to dozens of civilian casualties, the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian
From 25 to 31 January 2025, the Russian Armed Forces have carried out seven group strikes by high-precision weapons and strike drones, which have engaged critical energy facilities that support the work of the Ukrainian defence industry. In addition, the infrastructure of military airfields, assembly, storage, and launching sites of strike drones and uncrewed surface vehicles
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 30.01.25 personnel ‒ about 835940 (+1270) persons, tanks ‒ 9890 (+4), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 20614 (+17), artillery systems – 22412 (+17), MLRS – 1264 (+0), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 1050 (+0), aircraft – 369 (+0), helicopters – 331 (+0), UAV
The United Kingdom (UK), Finland, and Czechia announced several immediate and longer-term military assistance packages for Ukraine on January 31. Ukrainian Defense Minister Rustem Umerov stated on January 31 that the UK will provide Ukraine with a military assistance package valued at two billion GBP (about $2.5 billion), primarily for the
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one motorised infantry brigade and one air assault brigade of the AFU near Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 50 troops, one armoured personnel
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 30.01.25 personnel ‒ about 835940 (+1270) persons, tanks ‒ 9890 (+4), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 20614 (+17), artillery systems – 22412 (+17), MLRS – 1264 (+0), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 1050 (+0), aircraft – 369 (+0), helicopters – 331 (+0), UAV
Kremlin newswire TASS published an interview with Valdai Discussion Club Research Director Fyodor Lukyanov on January 30 entitled “Don’t count on big agreements,” highlighting the Kremlin’s ongoing efforts to shape domestic and global expectations about future negotiations between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US President Donald Trump. The Valdai Discussion Club is an
In Kharkov direction, the Sever Group of Forces hit units of a motorised infantry brigade and an assault brigade of the AFU near Liptsy and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 30 troops, an armoured fighting vehicle, a motor vehicle, and two field artillery guns. The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian units engaged manpower
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 29.01.25: personnel: about 834 670 (+1 670) persons tanks: 9 886 (+10) troop-carrying AFVs: 20 597 (+24) artillery systems: 22 395 (+29) MLRS: 1 264 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 050 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 23 456 (+57)cruise missiles: 3
January 31, 2025
Report from the National Unity Government Ministry of Human Rights
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.