Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff: Approximately 1,370 Russian casualties in the past day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 02.01.25:  personnel: about  792 170 (+1 370) persons   tanks: 9 676 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs: 20 056 (+13) artillery systems: 21 552 (+20) MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 330 (+0) UAVs operational-tactical level: 21 200 (+69)cruise missiles: 3 003

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,050 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

  In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces defeated units of one motorised Infantry brigade of the AFU and two territorial defence brigades close to Malye Prokhody, Sininovka, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 45 troops, one motor vehicle, and one 152-mm D-20 gun.  The Zapad Group of Forces’ units improved the situation along the front line,

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:  About 1,250 Russian casualties in the past day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 1.01.25:  personnel: about  790 800 (+1 250) persons   tanks: 9 672 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs: 20 043 (+13) artillery systems: 21 532 (+4) MLRS: 1 256 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 032 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 330 (+1)UAVs operational-tactical level: 21 131 (+50)cruise missiles: 3 003

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War:  Russia gains Ukrainian land at a cost of 427,000 casualties in 2024 

Russian forces gained 4,168 square kilometers, largely comprised of fields and small settlements in Ukraine and Kursk Oblast, at a reported cost of over 420,000 casualties in 2024. Ukrainian Commander-in-Chief Colonel General Oleksandr Syrskyi stated on December 30 that Russian forces suffered 427,000 casualties in 2024.[1] ISW has observed geolocated evidence to

Read More »

January 3, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 12, 455 Ukrainian casualties from Dec 28 to Jan 3

Russian Defense Ministry

From 28 December 2024 to 3 January 2025, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered one mass strike and 12 groups strikes by precision weaponry and attack UAVs, as a result of which fire damage was inflicted on power objects ensuring operation of Ukrainian defence industry enterprises, one gun powder plant, infrastructure of military airfields, ammunition depots, POL depots, attack UAV and uncrewed surface vehicle workshops and depots as well as temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries. 

▫️ Over the past week, units of the Sever Group of Forces continued to eliminate AFU formations on the territory of Kursk region. Aviation, UAVs, and artillery inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of seven mechanised brigades, three air assault brigades of the AFU, one marine brigade, and four territorial defence brigadesIn Kharkov direction, Russian troops inflicted losses on units of one mechanised brigadeone motorised infantry brigade of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades.

Over the past week in the area of the Sever Group of Forces responsibility, the AFU losses amounted to more than 3,130 troops, four tanks, five infantry fighting vehicles, seven armoured personnel carriers, and 51 armoured fighting vehicles. One hundred twenty-one motor vehicles, 28 field artillery guns, and six electronic warfare stations were destroyed. 

▫️ Units of the Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation along the front line and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one tank brigadefour mechanised brigades, two air assault brigades of the AFU, five territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades. In addition, 35 counter-attacks launched by AFU assault detachments were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to more than 3,175 troops, two tanks, four infantry fighting vehicles, nine armoured personnel carriers, including seven U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, and four other armoured fighting vehicles. Thirty-six motor vehicles, 26 field artillery guns, including 13 NATO-made guns, eight electronic warfare stations, and 11 ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️ Units of the Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and inflicted losses on formations of five mechanised brigades, two motorised infantry brigadesone infantry brigadetwo airmobile brigades of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigadesEight counter-attacks launched by the enemy were repelled.

Over the past week in this direction, the AFU losses amounted to up to 1,745 troops, two tanks, four infantry fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, three armoured personnel carriers, including one UK-made Saxon and two U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, four other armoured fighting vehicles, seven motor vehicles, and nine field artillery guns. Five electronic warfare stations and three ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️As a result of decisive actions, units of the Tsentr Group of Forces liberated Novotroitskoye and Novoolenovka (Donetsk People’s Republic). Losses were inflicted on units of one tank brigade, six mechanised brigades, two motorised infantry brigades, one jaeger brigade, one mountain assault brigade of the AFU, two marine brigadestwo territorial defence brigades, three national guard brigades, and one assault brigade of the National Police of Ukraine. In addition, 85 counter-attacks launched by AFU units were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to more than 2,750 troops, seven tanks, including three German-made Leopard tanks, ten armoured fighting vehicles, including one U.S.-made Bradley infantry fighting vehicle, 13 armoured personnel carriers, including four U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carriers, and 16 other armoured fighting vehicles. Moreover, 26 motor vehicles and 28 field artillery guns were destroyed.

rigade, three mechanised brigadesone motorised infantry brigade of the AFU, and two territorial defence brigades. In addition, 14 counter-attacks launched by the enemy’s assault detachments were repelled.

The AFU losses amounted to up to 1,155 troops, two tanks, three armoured fighting vehicles, 26 motor vehicles, 23 field artillery guns, including five U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-propelled artillery systems.

▫️Units of the Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigadeone infantry brigade of the AFU, one marine brigade, and three territorial defence brigades.

The AFU losses amounted to more than 500 troops, 30 motor vehicles, six field artillery guns, five electronic warfare stations, and five ammunition depots.

▫️Over the past week, 46 Ukrainian servicemen were taken prisoner in the line of contact.

▫️Air defence units shot down one Su-27 aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force, three French-made Hammer guided aviation bombs, 33 U.S.-made HIMARS and Uragan MLRS projectiles as well as 559 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️Units of the Black Sea Fleet destroyed 11 uncrewed surface vehicles.

▫️In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 651 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 39,207 unmanned aerial vehicles, 590 anti-aircraft missile systems, 20,208 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,505 MLRS combat vehicles, 20,163 field artillery guns and mortars, and 29,832 units of support military vehicles have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.