The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.02.25: personnel: about 863 580 (+1 190) persons tanks: 10 134 (+14) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 112 (+14)artillery systems: 23 410 (+63) MLRS: 1 291 (+3)anti-aircraft systems: 1 078 (+6) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 26 021 (+160)cruise missiles: 3064
The Financial Times (FT) published an investigation on February 20 supporting ISW’s long-held assessment that Russian military commanders are either complicit in or directly enabling subordinates to execute Ukrainian prisoners of war (POWs) in clear violation of iternational law.[1] The FT investigation provided additional details and analysis following a significant increase in the
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of one motorised infantry brigade and one territorial defence brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) near Volchansk (Kharkov region). Group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.02.25: personnel: about 862 390 (+1 300) persons tanks: 10 120 (+19) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 098 (+23)artillery systems: 23 347 (+72) MLRS: 1 288 (+3)anti-aircraft systems: 1 068 (+0) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 25 861 (+175)cruise missiles: 3
Ukraine Military Situation Report | February 19 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the war in Ukraine. Executive Summary — Russian sabotage squads: The Kremlin has activated a new intelligence unit tasked with staging subversive activities against NATO member states. — Courts-martial in Kyiv: Ukraine initiated the courts-martial of three generals
Russian President Vladimir Putin is reportedly trying to optimize the Russian negotiations delegation to be most effective with the specific individuals whom the United States chooses for its negotiation delegation, likely in an effort to extract maximum concessions from the United States. Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov stated on February 19 that
continue the special military operation. In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of two territorial defence brigades close to Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses were more than 25 troops and two motor vehicles. As a result of decisive actions, units of the Zapad Group of Forces liberated Yampolovka (Donetsk People’s
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.02.25: personnel: about 861 090 (+1 170) persons tanks: 10 101 (+12) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 075 (+12)artillery systems: 23 275 (+53) MLRS: 1 285 (+2)anti-aircraft systems: 1 068 (+1) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 25 586 (+181)cruise missiles: 3
Russian and American officials met in Saudi Arabia for bilateral talks about the war in Ukraine on February 18, but Russia continues to display no indications that it is prepared to make any meaningful concessions on Ukraine as assessed by Western intelligence and US officials in line with ISW’s longstanding
In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of two territorial defence brigades close to Liptsy and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU lost up to 35 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, and one artillery gun. One materiel depot was destroyed. As a result of the decisive actions
February 20, 2025
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.02.25:
personnel: about 863 580 (+1 190) persons
tanks: 10 134 (+14)
troop-carrying AFVs: 21 112 (+14)
artillery systems: 23 410 (+63)
MLRS: 1 291 (+3)
anti-aircraft systems: 1 078 (+6)
aircraft: 370 (+0)
helicopters: 331 (+0)
UAVs operational-tactical level: 26 021 (+160)
cruise missiles: 3064 (+0)
warships/boats: 28 (+0)
submarines: 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks: 37 961 (+136)
special equipment: 3 752 (+0)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
