Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff:  about 1,190 Russian casualties in the past day; 58 Russian tanks and armored personnel carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 10.03.25:  personnel: about 886 320 (+1 190) persons   tanks: 10 292 (+18)     troop-carrying AFVs: 21 400 (+40) artillery systems: 24 271 (+65)   MLRS: 1 311 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 102 (+1)  aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 603 (+241)cruise missiles: 3 120 (+0)warships/boats: 28

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: Up to 1,360 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.  In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces hit formations of two motorised infantry brigades of the AFU close to Kazachya Lopan and Volchansk (Kharkov region).  The AFU losses amounted to up to 50 troops, nine motor vehicles, and four artillery guns. One communication station was neutralised.  Units

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: About 1,180 Russian casualties in the past day; 20 Russian tanks and armored personnel carriers destroyed or disabled

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 9.03.25:  personnel: about 885 130 (+1 180) persons   tanks: 10 274 (+6)     troop-carrying AFVs: 21 360 (+14) artillery systems: 24 206 (+58)   MLRS: 1 310 (+3)anti-aircraft systems: 1 101 (+2)  aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 362

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War. Russia advances in Kursk

Institute for the Study of War. Russia advances in Kursk Russian forces are collapsing the northern part of the Ukrainian salient in Kursk Oblast following several days of intensified Russian activity in the area. Geolocated footage published on March 8 indicates that Russian forces seized Novaya Sorochina (northwest of Sudzha), Malaya

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 705 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Institute for the Study of War: U.S. intelligence suspension affects Ukraine battlefield The extent of the US suspension of intelligence sharing with Ukraine remains unclear. The Washington Post reported on March 7 that a statement by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) noted that the NGA “temporarily suspended [Ukraine’s] access” to the system

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:About 1,000 Russian casualties in the past day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 8.03.25:  personnel: about 883 950 (+1 000) persons   tanks: 10 268 (+4)     troop-carrying AFVs: 21 346 (+12) artillery systems: 24 148 (+24)   MLRS: 1 307 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 099 (+3)  aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 172

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: Up to 10,375 Ukrainian casualties from March 1 to 7

 From 1 to 7 March, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out seven group strikes with high-precision weapons and strike drones, which destroyed the infrastructure of military airfields, ammunition depots, drone manufacturing shops, depots, and command posts for strike unmanned aerial vehicles, watercraft depots, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations, nationalists, and foreign

Read More »

March 10, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 1,185 Ukrainian casualties in the past day; One Ukrainian MiG-29 shot down

Russian Defense Ministry

 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

▫️ In Kharkov direction, the Sever Group of Forces defeated formations of three motorised infantry brigades of the AFU and one territorial defence brigade near Volchansk and Kazachya Lopan (Kharkov region).

The AFU losses were more than 30 troops and three motor vehicles.

▫️ The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. The Group inflicted damage on manpower and military hardware of four mechanised brigades of the AFU close to Kondrashovka, Zagoruykovka, Monachinovka, Gorokhovatka, and Podvysokoye(Kharkov region).

The AFU losses amounted to up to 210 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, five motor vehicles, two Western-made field artillery guns, one electronic warfare station, and one U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 U.S. counter-battery warfare station.

The Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. The Group hit formations of two mechanised brigades of the AFU, one territorial defence brigade, and two National Guard brigades close to Grigorovka, Konstantinovka, Shcherbinovka, Dronovka, and Druzhkovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU sustained losses of up to 270 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, six motor vehicles, six field artillery guns, and three field ammunition depots.

▫️ The Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of enemy defences. The Group’s units hit two mechanised brigades, one assault brigade, two jaeger brigades of the AFU, one marine brigade, and one National Guard brigade near Uspenovka, Novopavlovka, Udachnoye, Petrovskoye, Alekseyevka, and Krasnoarmeysk (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The enemy lost up to 490 troops, one tank, one armoured fighting vehicle, one Grad MLRS combat vehicle, six motor vehicles, and four artillery guns.

▫️  The Vostok Group’s units inflicted fire damage on units of two mechanised brigades, one jaeger brigade of the Ukrainian Armed Forces, and one marine brigade close to Fedorovka, Bogatyr, Veseloye, and Razliv (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The enemy losses amounted to more than 120 troops, one tank, and three motor vehicles.

▫️ The Dnepr Group’s units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of one mechanised brigade and one mountain assault brigade of the AFU close to Pyatikhatki, Pavlovka (Zaporozhye region), and Novonikolayevka (Kherson region).

Up to 65 troops, five motor vehicles, and one field artillery gun of the Armed Forces of Ukraine were neutralised.

▫️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, strike drones, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces have hit military airfield infrastructure facilities, as well as clusters of AFU manpower and hardware and foreign mercenaries in 152 areas.

▫️ Russia’s air defence systems shot down one MiG-29 aircraft of the Ukrainian Air Force, as well as five JDAM guided aerial bombs, seven HIMARS MLRS projectiles manufactured by the USA, and 50 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️ In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, 657 aircraft, 283 helicopters, 45,927 unmanned aerial vehicles, 600 anti-aircraft missile systems, 22,097 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,526 MLRS combat vehicles, 22,403 field artillery guns and mortars, and 32,658 units of support military vehicles of the enemy have been neutralised.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.