The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 9.03.25: personnel: about 885 130 (+1 180) persons tanks: 10 274 (+6) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 360 (+14) artillery systems: 24 206 (+58) MLRS: 1 310 (+3)anti-aircraft systems: 1 101 (+2) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 362
Institute for the Study of War. Russia advances in Kursk Russian forces are collapsing the northern part of the Ukrainian salient in Kursk Oblast following several days of intensified Russian activity in the area. Geolocated footage published on March 8 indicates that Russian forces seized Novaya Sorochina (northwest of Sudzha), Malaya
Institute for the Study of War: U.S. intelligence suspension affects Ukraine battlefield The extent of the US suspension of intelligence sharing with Ukraine remains unclear. The Washington Post reported on March 7 that a statement by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) noted that the NGA “temporarily suspended [Ukraine’s] access” to the system
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 8.03.25: personnel: about 883 950 (+1 000) persons tanks: 10 268 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 346 (+12) artillery systems: 24 148 (+24) MLRS: 1 307 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 099 (+3) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 172
The extent of the US suspension of intelligence sharing with Ukraine remains unclear. The Washington Post reported on March 7 that a statement by the US National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) noted that the NGA “temporarily suspended [Ukraine’s] access” to the system that provides Ukraine with commercial satellite imagery that the United States has
From 1 to 7 March, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out seven group strikes with high-precision weapons and strike drones, which destroyed the infrastructure of military airfields, ammunition depots, drone manufacturing shops, depots, and command posts for strike unmanned aerial vehicles, watercraft depots, temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations, nationalists, and foreign
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 7.03.25: personnel: about 882 950 (+1 150) persons tanks: 10 264 (+3) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 334 (+23) artillery systems: 24 124 (+16) MLRS: 1 306 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 096 (+0) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 024
Russian forces conducted one of the largest ever missile and drone strikes against Ukraine on the night of March 6 to 7 as Russian forces continue to adapt strike packages to overwhelm Ukraine’s air defense umbrella by increasing the total number of Shahed and decoy drones in each strike. Russian forces
In Kharkov direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on formations of two mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and one territorial defence brigade close to Rassokhovatoye, Kazachya Lopan, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 25 troops, one armoured fighting vehicle, and two motor vehicles. Units of the Zapad Group of
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 6.03.25: personnel: about 881 800 (+1 140) persons tanks: 10 261 (+5) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 311 (+7) artillery systems: 24 108 (+21) MLRS: 1 306 (+0)anti-aircraft systems: 1 096 (+2) aircraft: 370 (+0)helicopters: 331 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 27 929
March 9, 2025
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 9.03.25:
personnel: about 885 130 (+1 180) persons
tanks: 10 274 (+6)
troop-carrying AFVs: 21 360 (+14)
artillery systems: 24 206 (+58)
MLRS: 1 310 (+3)
anti-aircraft systems: 1 101 (+2)
aircraft: 370 (+0)
helicopters: 331 (+0)
UAVs operational-tactical level: 28 362 (+190)
cruise missiles: 3 120 (+0)
warships/boats: 28 (+0)
submarines: 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks: 39 933 (+142)
special equipment: 3 773 (+1)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
