Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,490 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 20 September 2025  Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a massive strike by long-range air and ground-based high-precision weapons as well as with unmanned aerial vehicles against enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry developing the Sapsan operational-tactical

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:  about 1,150 Russian casualties in the past day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.09.25: personnel: about 1 099 530 (+1 150) personstanks: 11 191 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 278 (+1)artillery systems: 32 896 (+17)MLRS: 1 492 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 218 (+1)aircraft: 422 (+0)helicopters: 341 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 60 680 (+211)cruise missiles: 3 718

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War: Russian MiGs violate Estonian airspace

Russian MiG-31 interceptor jets violated Estonian airspace on September 19. The Estonian General Staff reported on September 19 that three Russian MiG-31 interceptor jets violated Estonian airspace over the Gulf of Finland near Vaindloo Island (about 81 kilometers southeast of Helsinki) for roughly 12 minutes.[1] The Estonian General Staff reported that

Read More »

Russian Ninistry of Defense: up to 1,395 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.  The Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on three mechanised brigades, a motorised infantry brigade, and an assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine close to Andreyevka, Konstantinovka, Yunakovka, and Miropolye (Sumy region).  In Kharkov direction, units of

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff:  about 930 Russian casualties in the past day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.09.25: personnel: about 1 098 380 (+930) personstanks: 11 191 (+2)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 277 (+0)artillery systems: 32 879 (+33)MLRS: 1 491 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 217 (+0)aircraft: 422 (+0)helicopters: 341 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 60 469 (+390)cruise missiles: 3 718 (+0)warships/boats:

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: about 1,020 Russian casualties in the past day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.09.25: personnel: about 1 097 450 (+1020) personstanks: 11 189 (+5)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 277 (+3)artillery systems: 32 846 (+36)MLRS: 1 490 (+2)anti-aircraft systems: 1 217 (+0)aircraft: 422 (+0)helicopters: 341 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 60 079 (+360)cruise missiles: 3 718 (+0)warships/boats:

Read More »

September 20, 2025

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 1,490 Ukrainian casualties in the past day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 20 September 2025

💥 Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a massive strike by long-range air and ground-based high-precision weapons as well as with unmanned aerial vehicles against enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry developing the Sapsan operational-tactical missile systems, production sites of multi-purpose strike and reconnaissance unmanned aerial vehicles, robotic systems, counter-UAVs, and loitering munitions.

✅ The goal of the strike has been achieved. All the assigned targets have been engaged.

💥 The Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on formations of a heavy mechanised brigade, three mechanised brigades, a jaeger brigade, a motorised infantry brigade, and an assault regiment of the AFU near Alekseyevka, Mogritsa, Sadki, Sennoye, and Khrapovshchina (Sumy region).

💥 In Kharkov direction, units of an infantry brigade  of the AFU and a territorial defence brigade have been hit near Volchansk and Tikhoye (Kharkov region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to up to 215 troops, a tank, an armoured fighting vehicle, 12 motor vehicles, and four field artillery guns including three manufactured by NATO countries.

📍 The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of a mechanised brigade, an assault brigade, an airmobile brigade, an air assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and national guard brigade near Borovskaya Andreyevka, Kupyansk, Novonikolayevka, Novoplatonovka, Senkovo (Kharkov region), Derilovo, Shandrigolovo, and Yampol (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy losses amounted to more than 240 troops, four armoured fighting vehicles including two U.S.-made HMMWV armoured vehicles, and 16 pickup trucks. Six electronic warfare stations and five ammunition depots were neutralised.

📍 The Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. The Russian Armed Forces hit three mechanised brigades, an airmobile brigade,  an assault brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, a marine brigade, and a territorial defence brigade near Konstantinovka, Pereyezdnoye, Platonovka, Pleshcheyevka, Seversk, and Fedorovka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️ The enemy lost up to 245 troops, an armoured fighting vehicle, 12 motor vehicles, and a field artillery gun. One electronic warfare station and two ammunition depots were neutralised.

hanised brigades, two mechanised brigades, a jaeger brigade, an air assault brigade, two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, two marine brigades, two territorial defence brigades, and a national guard brigade near Artyomovka, Dimitrov, Krasnoarmeysk, Krasny Liman, Krivorozhye, Nikolaypolye, Rodinskoye, Udachnoye (Donetsk People’s Republic), Ivanovka, and Filiya in Dnepropetrovsk region.

▪️ The enemy lost up to 480 troops, a tank, five armoured fighting vehicles, four motor vehicles, and a U.S.-made 155-mm Paladin self-propelled artillery system.

🚩 The Vostok Group of Forces continued to advance to the depths of the enemy’s defence and liberated Berezovoye (Dnepropetrovsk region).

💥 Russian elements engaged two mechanised brigades of the Armed Forces of Ukraine and two territorial defence brigades near Verbovoye, Gavrilovka, Kalinovskoye, and Podgavrilovka (Dnepropetrovsk region).

▪️ The AFU losses amounted to more than 270 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, 14 motor vehicles, and an electronic warfare station.

💥 The Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the two coastal defence brigades, a mountain assault brigade of the AFU, and a territorial defence brigade near Malye Shcherbaki, Stepnogorsk (Zaporozhye region), Dneprovskoye, and Tyaginka (Kherson region).

The AFU lost up to 40 troops and four motor vehicles. Two electronic warfare stations and two ammunition depots were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces inflicted damage on ammunition depots, launch sites of long-range UAVs as well as temporary deployment areas of the Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 151 areas.

🎯 Air defence systems shot down 383 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

📊 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation, the enemy has lost

▫️ 667 aircraft, 

▫️ 283 helicopters, 

▫️ 85,418 unmanned aerial vehicles, 

▫️ 628 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

▫️ 25,188 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

▫️ 1,592 MLRS combat vehicles, 

▫️ 29,749 field artillery guns and mortars,  

▫️ 42,244 support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.