Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff: about 940 Russian casualties in the last day

Total russian military losses on March 21, 2026: 940 personnel, 1,885 UAVs, and 30 artillery systems. According to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the estimated total russian war losses from 24.02.22 to 22.03.26 inclusive are as follows Personnel: Armored vehicles and automotive equipment: Artillery and air

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War:

Ukraine has been imposing increasing challenges on Russia at the tactical, operational, and strategic levels since the beginning of 2026. Ukrainian drone units have been increasingly prioritizing and executing successful strikes against Russian artillery, drone operators and logistics targets in the near rear to achieve tactical effects.[1] The planning head of

Read More »

March 22, 2026

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 915 Ukrainian casualties in the last day

Russian Defense Ministry

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 22 March 2026

The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation.

🚩 As a result of resolute actions, units of the Sever Group of Forces gained control over the settlement of Potapovka in Sumy region.

📍The Group’s units inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of a territorial defence brigade close to Velikaya Chernechina, Ikriskovshchina, and Novaya Sech in Sumy region.

💥 In Kharkov region, units of two mechanised brigades, a motorised infantry brigade of the AFU, two territorial defence brigades, and two national guard brigades were hit close to Verkhnyaya Pisarevka, Veseloye, Izbitskoye, Prikolotnoye, and Shevchenkovo in Kharkov region.

▪️The AFU losses amounted to up to 200 troops, three armoured fighting vehicles, nine motor vehicles, and one artillery gun. An ammunition depot, a fuel depot, and three materiel depots were neutralised.

📍The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Russian troops inflicted losses on formations of four mechanised brigades, an assault brigade, a security brigade of the General Staff of the AFU, a territorial defence brigade, and a national guard brigade near Novoosinovo, Staroverovka, Tamarganovka (Kharkov region), Koroviy Yar, Krasny Liman, Svyatogorsk, and Sosnovoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

▪️The enemy losses amounted to up to 190 troops, one infantry fighting vehicle, three armoured vehicles, 21 motor vehicles, and three artillery guns. One electronic warfare station and two ammunition depots were neutralised.

📍The Yuzhnaya Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. The Group’s units hit formations of four mechanised brigades, an assault brigade, an airmobile brigade, a mountain assault brigade of the AFU, and a marine brigade close to Druzhkovka, Konstantinovka, Kramatorsk, Nikolayevka, Piscunovka, and Rai-Aleksandrovka in the Donetsk People’s Republic.

▪️The enemy lost more than 120 troops, one U.S.-made M113 armoured personnel carrier and one U.S.-made Stryker armoured vehicle, four armoured fighting vehicles, 18 motor vehicles, and three field artillery guns. An ammunition depot and four materiel depots were neutralised.

📍The Tsentr Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line. Russian troops inflicted losses on formations of five mechanised brigades, an airmobile brigade, an airborne brigade, an assault regiment of the AFU, a marine brigade, the Azov Special Operations Brigade, and six national guard brigades near Belitskoye, Vasilyvka, Vodyanskoye, Dobropolye, Lenina, Priyut, Torskoye in the Donetsk People’s Republic, Ivanovka, and Novopodgorodnoye in Dnepropetrovsk region.

▪️The AFU losses amounted to more than 360 troops, three armoured personnel carriers, eight armoured fighting vehicles, 16 motor vehicles, and one 155-mm Bogdana self-propelled artillery system.

ogdana self-propelled artillery system, and one materiel depot.

📍The Dnepr Group’s units improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of a mechanised brigade of the AFU and a marine brigade near Grigorovka, Orekhov, Preobrazhenka (Zaporozhye region), and Kazatskoye (Kherson region).

▪️Up to 45 troops, three pickup trucks, one electronic warfare station, and two materiel depots of the enemy were neutralised.

✈️ Operational-Tactical Aviation, attack drones, missile troops and artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces inflicted damage on the facilities of the Ukrainian fuel and power infrastructure, used in the interests of the AFU, on the facilities for preparation and launch of long-range unmanned aerial vehicles, as well as on temporary deployment areas of Ukrainian armed formations and foreign mercenaries in 144 areas.

▫️ Air defence systems shot down eight guided aerial bombs and 244 fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

 In total, since the beginning of the special military operation the enemy has lost: 

  671 aircraft, 

  284 helicopters, 

  126,137 unmanned aerial vehicles,

  652 anti-aircraft missile systems, 

  28,423 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 

  1,690 MLRS combat vehicles, 

  33,999 field artillery guns and mortars,

  57,480 units of support military vehicles.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.