The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.08.24 personnel ‒ about 601,800 (+1330) persons, tanks ‒ 8518 (+5), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16521 (+26), artillery systems – 17156 (+52), MLRS – 1166 (+1), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 926 (+1), aircraft – 367 (+0), helicopters – 328 (+0), UAV
Ukrainian forces continued attacking throughout the Ukrainian salient in Kursk Oblast on August 20 and recently made additional advances. Ukrainian forces appear to be continuing efforts to strike Russian pontoon bridges and pontoon engineering equipment west of the current Kursk Oblast salient over the Seim River in Glushkovo Raion—geolocated footage published
In Volchansk and Liptsy directions, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of the AFU 22nd Mechanised Brigade, 82nd Airborne Assault Brigade, and 17th Tank Brigade near Zolochev (Kharkov region), Mogritsa and Lugovka (Sumy region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 105 troops, one tank, six motor vehicles, one U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, one 152-mm D-20 gun, one 122-mm 2S1 Gvozdika self-propelled
Ukrainian forces continued to marginally advance in Kursk Oblast on August 19 amid continued fighting throughout the Ukrainian salient in the area. Geolocated footage published on August 19 indicates that Ukrainian forces advanced in Vishnevka (southwest of Koronevo and 14km from the international border). The Russian Ministry of Defense (MoD) claimed that
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.08.24 personnel ‒ about 600,470 (+1120) persons, tanks ‒ 8513 (+5), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16495 (+15), artillery systems – 17104 (+48), РСЗВ / MLRS – 1165 (+4), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 925 (+2), aircraft – 367 (+0), helicopters – 328
In Volchansk and Liptsy directions, the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 43rd Mechanised Brigade, 92nd Assault Brigade, 36th Marine Brigade of the Armed Forces of Ukraine (AFU) near Staritsa, Okhrimovka, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to up to 170 Ukrainian troops, one tank,
Ukrainian forces continued assaults throughout their salient in Kursk Oblast on August 18 and marginally advanced southeast of Sudzha.Geolocated footage published on August 17 shows Russian forces striking a Ukrainian armored vehicle in northern Martynovka (northeast of Sudzha), indicating that Ukrainian forces recently advanced into northern Martynovka. A Russian milblogger
The estimated cumulative enemy combat losses from 24.02.22 to 18.08.24: Personnel: about 599350 (+1170) personsTanks: 8508 (+7)Troop-carrying AFVs: 16480 (+7)Artillery systems: 17056 (+71)MLRS: 1161 (+1)Anti-aircraft systems: 923 (+1)Aircraft: 367 (+0)Helicopters: 328 (+0)UAV operational-tactical level: 13752 (+38)Cruise missiles: 2432 (+3)Warships/boats: 28 (+0)Submarines: 1 (+0)Vehicles and fuel tanks: 22992 (+79)Special equipment: 2846 (+2)
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Volchansk and Liptsy directions, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the AFU 43rd Mechanised Brigade, 92nd Assault Brigade, 36th Marine Brigade near Liptsy, Beliy Kolodez, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses amounted to
The Ukrainian incursion into Kursk Oblast and Russian offensive operations in eastern Ukraine are not in themselves decisive military operations that will win the war. Both Russian and Ukrainian forces lack the capability to conduct individual decisive war-winning operations and must instead conduct multiple successive operations with limited operational objectives
August 20, 2024
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.08.24
personnel ‒ about 601,800 (+1330) persons,
tanks ‒ 8518 (+5),
troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 16521 (+26),
artillery systems – 17156 (+52),
MLRS – 1166 (+1),
anti-aircraft systems ‒ 926 (+1),
aircraft – 367 (+0),
helicopters – 328 (+0),
UAV operational-tactical level – 13864 (+55),
cruise missiles ‒ 2438 (+1),
warships / boats ‒ 28 (+0),
submarines – 1 (+0),
vehicles and fuel tanks – 23142 (+95),
special equipment ‒ 2885 (+22)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
