The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.09.24 personnel ‒ about 634860 (+1060) persons, tanks ‒ 8683 (+3), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 17071 (+8), artillery systems – 18123 (+14), MLRS – 1187 (+1), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 947 (+0), aircraft – 369 (+0), helicopters – 328 (+0), UAV
Ukraine has taken steps to address its manpower shortages, but delays and insufficiencies in Western military aid to Ukraine continue to limit its ability to generate effective combat units that can defend critical areas and contest the theater-wide initiative. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated in an interview with CNN on September
The Sever Group of Forces In Liptsy and Volchansk directions inflicted damage on formations of 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 36th Marine Brigade, 113th and 127th territorial defence brigades near Liptsy and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU sustained losses amounted to up to 150 troops, five armoured fighting vehicles, four motor vehicles, a French-made 155-mm Ceaser howitzer, a 152-mm D-20 gun, three 122-mm D-30 howitzers, and
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 15.09.24: personnel: about 633800 (+1170) persons,tanks ‒ 8680 (+6)troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 17063 (+20)artillery systems – 18109 (+23)MLRS – 1186 (+0)anti-aircraft systems ‒ 947 (+1)aircraft – 369 (+0)helicopters – 328 (+0)UAV operational-tactical level – 15234 (+85)cruise missiles ‒ 2592 (+1)warships/ boats ‒ 28 (+0)submarines – 1
Russia reportedly aims to achieve a decisive victory in Ukraine by 2026 before likely medium- to long-term economic and force generation constraints begin to significantly degrade Russia’s ability to sustain its war effort in Ukraine. Ukrainian Main Military Intelligence Directorate (GUR) Head Lieutenant General Kyrylo Budanov announced on September 15 at the 20th
The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 14th, 44th, 54th, 115th mechanised brigades, 3rd Assault Brigade of the AFU, and 104th and 119th territorial defence brigades near Kovsharovka, Glushkovka, Novoosinovo, Kruglyakovka, Borovaya (Kharkov region), Rozovka (Lugansk People’s Republic) and Terny
personnel: about 632630 (+1210) persons,tanks ‒ 8674 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 17043 (+40)artillery systems – 18086 (+25)MLRS – 1186 (+1)anti-aircraft systems ‒ 946 (+1)aircraft – 369 (+0)helicopters – 328 (+0)UAV operational-tactical level – 15149 (+36)cruise missiles ‒ 2591 (+0)warships/ boats ‒ 28 (+0)submarines – 1 (+0)vehicles and fuel tanks – 24631 (+71)special equipment ‒ 3084 (+13)
Ukrainian officials and sources indicated that Ukraine’s incursion into Kursk Oblast has prompted the Russian authorities to increase the size of the Russian force grouping in Kursk Oblast by upwards of a factor of three. Ukrainian Pivnich (Northern) Operational Command Spokesperson Vadym Mysnyk stated on September 14 that Russian forces had
From 7 to 13 September 2024, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have carried out 39 group strikes with precision-guided weapons and strike drones, as a result of which the following have been hit: oil and energy installations used for Ukrainian defence Industry, airbases’ infrastructure, workshops for manufacturing powder and operational missile
WAR ROOM The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 13.09.24 personnel ‒ about 631420 (+1220) persons, tanks ‒ 8671 (+18), troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 17003 (+48), artillery systems – 18061 (+52), MLRS – 1185 (+1), anti-aircraft systems ‒ 945 (+0), aircraft – 369 (+0), helicopters – 328
September 17, 2024
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.09.24
personnel ‒ about 634860 (+1060) persons,
tanks ‒ 8683 (+3),
troop-carrying AFVs ‒ 17071 (+8),
artillery systems – 18123 (+14),
MLRS – 1187 (+1),
anti-aircraft systems ‒ 947 (+0),
aircraft – 369 (+0),
helicopters – 328 (+0),
UAV operational-tactical level – 15263 (+29),
cruise missiles ‒ 2592 (+0),
warships / boats ‒ 28 (+0),
submarines – 1 (+0),
vehicles and fuel tanks – 24712 (+28),
special equipment ‒ 3090 (+6)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
