Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 2,150 Ukrainian casualties in 24 hours

he work of enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry, UAV production workshops, and positions of AFU manpower, weaponry, and materiel.  The goal of the strike has been achieved. All assigned targets were engaged. In Liptsy and Volchansk directions, the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 36th Marine Brigade,

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: About 1,440 Russian casualties in 24 hours; 59 Russian tanks or APC’s destroyed or disabled 

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 21.09.24: personnel: about 640920 (+1440) personstanks: 8746 (+21)troop-carrying AFVs: 17170 (+38)artillery systems: 18270 (+58)MLRS: 1193 (+4)anti-aircraft systems: 949 (+0)aircraft: 369 (+0)helicopters: 328 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 15561 (+92)cruise missiles:  2593 (+0)warships / boats: 28 (+0)submarines: 1 (+0)vehicles and fuel tanks: 24966 (+68)special equipment: 3125 (+10)

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 12,810 Ukrainian casualties from Sept 14-20; one Ukrainian MiG 29 and two SU-27’s shot down

From 14 to 20 September 2024, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have carried out 27 group strikes with precision-guided weapons and strike drones, as a result of which the following have been hit: power facilities that supported the work of enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry, airbases infrastructure, UAV depots and flight preparation areas. 

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: Up to 1,940 Ukrainian casualties in 24 hours

 The Sever Group of Forces in Liptsy and Volchansk directions inflicted damage on the 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 5th Border Security detachment, International Legion formations, and 113th Territorial Defence Brigade near Liptsy and Volchansk (Kharkov region), and the city of Kharkov. One counter-attack launched by an assault group of the Kraken nationalist formation was repelled.

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense: Up to 2,060 Ukrainian casualties in 24 hours

The Sever Group of Forces In Liptsy and Volchansk directions inflicted damage on formations of 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 36th Marine Brigade, and 5th Border Security detachment of the Ukrainian Border Guard near Volchansk (Kharkov region).   The AFU lost over 170 troops and a U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 counter-battery radar.  The Zapad Group of Forces improved tactical

Read More »

September 22, 2024

Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 2,150 Ukrainian casualties in 24 hours

Russian Defense Ministry

he work of enterprises of the Ukrainian defence industry, UAV production workshops, and positions of AFU manpower, weaponry, and materiel. 

The goal of the strike has been achieved. All assigned targets were engaged.

▫️In Liptsy and Volchansk directions, the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the 36th Marine Brigade, 113th Territorial Defence Brigade near Liptsy, Volchansk, and Volchanskiye Khutora (Kharkov region) and the city of Kharkov. 

Three counter-attacks launched by an assault detachment of the AFU 57th Motorised Infantry Brigade, 71st Jaeger Brigade were repelled.

The enemy lost up to 135 troops, two armoured fighting vehicles, four motor vehicles, two 152-mm D-20 guns, and two 122-mm D-30 howitzers.

▫️The Zapad Group of Forces improved the tactical situation and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 14th, 43rd, 44th, 54th, 66th mechanised brigades of the AFU, 110th, 117th, 125th territorial defence brigades, 1st National Guard Brigade near Petropavlovka, Zagryzovo, Izyumskoye, Vishnyovoye, Kolesnikovka, Kovsharovka (Kharkov region), Nevskoye, Novoyegorovka (Lugansk People’s Republic), and Torskoye (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The Russian units repelled two counter-attacks of 116th Mechanised Brigade and 3rd Assault Brigade of the AFU. The AFU losses amounted to up to 435 troops, for tanks, two U.S.-made M113 APCs, five motor vehicles, two U.S.-made 155-mm M777 and two U.S.-made 155-mm M198 howitzers, two 152-mm D-20 guns, and a 122-mm D-30 howitzer.  One U.S.-made AN/TPQ-50 counter-battery radar and seven field ammunition depots were destroyed.

▫️The Yug Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions as well as inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the AFU 24th, 28th, 30th, 54th, 93rd mechanised brigades, 56th, 59th motorised infantry brigades, 144th Infantry Brigade, 81st Airmobile Brigade, 10th, 128th mountain assault brigades, and 114th Territorial Defence Brigade near Seversk, Kramatorsk, Serebryanka, Verkhnekamenskoye, Chasov Yar, Predtechino, Belaya Gora, Ostroye, Kurakhovo, and Katerinonka (Donetsk People’s Republic).

The AFU losses are up to 840 troops, two tanks, two Kozak armoured fighting vehicles, 22 motor vehicles, four UK-made 155-mm FH-70 howitzers, a U.S.-made 155-mm M777 howitzer, a 152-mm D-20 gun, two 122-mm D-30 howitzers, and a U.S.-made 105-mm M1119 gun. Russian units destroyed three Anklav-N EW stations.

▫️The Tsentr Group of Forces continued advancing to the depth of the enemy’s defences and inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of the 23rd, 31st, 150th mechanised brigades, 144th Infantry Brigade, 46th Airmobile Brigade, 95th Air Assault Brigade, 78th Air Assault Regiment of the AFU, 109th, 112th, 119th territorial defence brigades, 14th, 15th brigades of the National Guard, and 3rd Border Security detachment near Pokrovsk, Dimitrov, Grodovka, Krutoy Yar, Selidovo, Ukrainsk, and Gornyak (Donetsk People’s Republic). 

The Russian units repelled nine counter-attacks of 100th Mechanised Brigade, 68th Jaeger Brigade, 25th Airborne Brigade, 425th Assault Battalion of the AFU, 2nd, 12th brigades, and 5th Regiment of the National Guard. The Ukrainian formations losses are up to 520 troops, two pickups, two 152-mm Msta-B howitzers, four 122-mm D-30 howitzers, a 100-mm Rapira anti-tank gun, as well as U.S.-made a MaxxPro armoured fighting vehicle, a 155-mm M777 howitzer, and a 105-mm M119 gun.  One AFU field ammunition depot was destroyed.

▫️The Vostok Group of Forces improved the situation along the front line and engaged formations of 72nd Mechanised Brigade, 58th Motorised Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 105th,241st territorial defence brigades, 21st National Guard Brigade near Ugledar, Novoukrainka, Zolotaya Niva, Velikaya Novosyolka (Donetsk People’s Republic), and Novodarovka (Zaporozhye region). 

The enemy losses amounted to up to 160 troops, an armoured fighting vehicle, two motor vehicles, two French-made 155-mm Caesar howitzers, a 152-mm D-20 gun, and an EW station.

▫️The Dnepr Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware 141st Infantry Brigade of the AFU, 37th Marine Brigade, 124th Territorial Defence Brigade, and 3rd National Guard Brigade near Nesteryanka, Pyatikhatki, Kamenskoye (Zaporozhye region), and Antonovka (Kherson region).

The enemy lost up to 60 troops and four motor vehicles. One AFU field ammunition depot was destroyed.

▫️Operational-Tactical Aviation, unmanned aerial vehicles, Missile Troops and Artillery of the Russian Groups of Forces destroyed two missile and artillery ammunition depots, a cargo ship carrying missiles and ammunition provided to the Kiev regime by the West states, as well as clusters of manpower and materiel in 153 areas. 

▫️Air defence units shot down six Neptune long-range missiles, three French-made Hammer guided aerial bombs, ten U.S.-made HIMARS rockets, and 177 Ukrainian fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles.

▫️In total, 646 airplanes and 283 helicopters, 31,983 unmanned aerial vehicles, 579 air defence missile systems, 18,317 tanks and other armoured fighting vehicles, 1,457 combat vehicles equipped with MLRS, 14,963 field artillery guns and mortars, as well as 26,328 units of special military equipment have been destroyed during the special military operation.

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.