The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.11.25: personnel: about 1 161 230 (+850) personstanks: 11 356 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 595 (+1)artillery systems: 34 511 (+12)MLRS: 1 546 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 247 (+0)aircraft: 428 (+0)helicopters: 347 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 82 086 (+293)cruise missiles: 3 940 (+0)warships/boats:
Ukraine Military Situation Report | November 19 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Battlefield assessment: Despite heavy combat, battle lines remained relatively stable. — Rafales to Ukraine: France agreed to provide Ukraine with a large contingent of Dassault Rafale combat aircraft. — Heavy
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 18 November 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on formations of three mechanised brigades, an infantry brigade, an air assault brigade, and an assault regiment of
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.11.25: personnel: about 1 160 380 (+960) persons tanks: 11 355 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 594 (+0) artillery systems: 34 499 (+13) MLRS: 1 545 (+1)
Russian forces may be attempting to fix Ukrainian forces within Pokrovsk itself while also encircling Ukrainian forces in the Pokrovsk-Myrnohrad pocket from the west, likely because Russian forces have found such an encirclement more feasible than an encirclement from the east. Elements of the Russian 2nd Combined Arms Army (CAA, Central
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 17 November 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. As a result of intensive operations, units of the Sever Group of Forces liberated the village of Dvurechanskoye (Kharkov region). Russian troops inflicted losses on formations of
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.11.25: personnel: about 1 159 420 (+1 160) persons tanks: 11 355 (+2)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 594 (+3) artillery systems: 34 486 (+17) MLRS: 1 544
.Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 16 November 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. As a result of resolute actions, the Sever Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on formations of one jaeger
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.11.25: personnel: about 1 158 260 (+860) personstanks: 11 353 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 591 (+3)artillery systems: 34 469 (+26)MLRS: 1 543 (+2)anti-aircraft systems: 1 244 (+0)aircraft: 428 (+0)helicopters: 347 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 81 286 (+409)cruise missiles: 3 940 (+0)warships/boats:
Russian forces are attempting to complete their encirclement of Ukrainian forces in Pokrovsk and Myrnohrad. Russian forces’ recent attempts to infiltrate Ukrainian lines north of Pokrovsk indicate that Russian forces are prioritizing efforts to complete the encirclement, aiming to physically sever Ukrainian ground lines of communication (GLOCs) north of Pokrovsk that
November 19, 2025
Ukraine Defense Ministry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.11.25:
personnel: about 1 161 230 (+850) persons
tanks: 11 356 (+1)
troop-carrying AFVs: 23 595 (+1)
artillery systems: 34 511 (+12)
MLRS: 1 546 (+1)
anti-aircraft systems: 1 247 (+0)
aircraft: 428 (+0)
helicopters: 347 (+0)
UAVs operational-tactical level: 82 086 (+293)
cruise missiles: 3 940 (+0)
warships/boats: 28 (+0)
submarines: 1 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks: 67 635 (+56)
special equipment: 4 001 (+1)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
