Archives

ARCHIVES

The BCFA Archive dates back to February 2022. Our archives allow members to study information preceding the most recent reports in order to gain full understanding regardless of their current familiarity with the topic of interest.

Ukrainian General Staff: about. 1,090 Russian casualties in the last day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.12.25: personnel: about 1 195 610 (+1 090) personstanks: 11 433 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 769 (+1)artillery systems: 35 287 (+37)MLRS: 1 575 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 263 (+0)aircraft: 432 (+0)helicopters: 347 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 92 488 (+346)cruise missiles: 4 073

Read More »

Russian Ministry of Defense:  up to 8,495 Ukrainian casualties between Dec 13-19

Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 13 — 19 December 2025  In response to terrorist attacks launched by Ukraine against civilian facilities in Russia, from 13 to 19 December, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered one massive and six group strikes by precision weaponry, including Kinzhal hypersonic air-launched ballistic missiles,

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: about 1,220 Russian casualties in the last day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.12.25: personnel: about 1 194 520 (+1 220) personstanks: 11 433 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 768 (+10)artillery systems: 35 250 (+18)MLRS: 1 574 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 263 (+0)aircraft: 432 (+0)helicopters: 347 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 92 142 (+426)cruise missiles: 4 073

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: about 950 Russian casualties in the last day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.12.25: personnel: about 1 193 300 (+950) personstanks: 11 432 (+5)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 758 (+0)artillery systems: 35 232 (+27)MLRS: 1 573 (+2)anti-aircraft systems: 1 263 (+1)aircraft: 432 (+0)helicopters: 347 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 91 716 (+330)cruise missiles: 4 073 (+0)warships/boats:

Read More »

Institute for the Study of War: Russian leaders reaffirm original war aims

Russian President Vladimir Putin and Russian Chief of the General Staff Army General Valery Gerasimov continue to publicly demonstrate their commitment to achieving Russia’s original war aims while exaggerating Russian battlefield gains. Putin stated during a December 17 ceremony awarding medals to Russian servicemembers that Russia will achieve all of its

Read More »

Ukrainian General Staff: about 1,730 Russian casualties in the last day

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.12.25: personnel: about 1 192 350 (+1 730) personstanks: 11 427 (+6)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 758 (+21)artillery systems: 35 205 (+33)MLRS: 1 571 (+1)anti-aircraft systems: 1 262 (+1)aircraft: 432 (+0)helicopters: 347 (+0)UAVs operational-tactical level: 91 386 (+167)cruise missiles: 4 073

Read More »

The Hudson Institute:  Russia puts heavy pressure on Siversk as Ukraine counter-attacks in Kupiansk

Ukraine Military Situation Report | December 17 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Battlefield assessment: The operational tempo of the war intensified once again. Russian forces exerted heavy pressure near the Ukrainian city of Siversk. — Drone warfare update: Ukraine used a new submersible

Read More »

December 20, 2025

Ukrainian General Staff: about. 1,090 Russian casualties in the last day

Ukraine Defense Ministry

The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.12.25:

personnel: about 1 195 610 (+1 090) persons
tanks: 11 433 (+0)
troop-carrying AFVs: 23 769 (+1)
artillery systems: 35 287 (+37)
MLRS: 1 575 (+1)
anti-aircraft systems: 1 263 (+0)
aircraft: 432 (+0)
helicopters: 347 (+0)
UAVs operational-tactical level: 92 488 (+346)
cruise missiles: 4 073 (+0)
warships/boats: 28 (+0)
submarines: 2 (+0)
vehicles and fuel tanks: 70 721 (+130)
special equipment: 4 028 (+1)

Share the Post:

Wilson Center

Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!

At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.

The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.

Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.

International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.

It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.