progress of special military operation as of 29 March 2025 ️The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 29.03.25: personnel: about 912 490 (+1 740) personstanks: 10 478 (+23)troop-carrying AFVs: 21 796 (+34) artillery systems: 25 451
Ukrainian and US officials continue to negotiate the terms of temporary ceasefires on Black Sea operations and energy infrastructure strikes, indicating the ceasefires are not yet fully codified. Ukraine’s Ministry of
of special military operation as of 22-28 March 2025 From 22 to 28 March 2025, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out seven group strikes by high-precision weapons and attack
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 28.03.25: personnel: about 910 750 (+1 860) personstanks: 10 455 (+17)troop-carrying AFVs: 21 762 (+61) artillery systems: 25 387
Russian President Vladimir Putin is reintensifying efforts to portray the current Ukrainian government as illegitimate and unable to engage in negotiations to end the war in Ukraine. Putin reiterated longstanding boilerplate
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on concentration areas of manpower and
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 27.03.25: personnel: about 908 890 (+1 670) persons tanks: 10 438 (+8) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 701 (+16)
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky reiterated on March 26 that discussions are ongoing about the details of the temporary ceasefire agreements on energy infrastructure strikes and maritime operations in the Black
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, the Sever Group of Forces inflicted damage on manpower and hardware of three mechanised brigades,
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
