The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 21.08.25 personnel –about 1073530 (+830) persons tanks – 11120 (+1) troop-carrying AFVs – 23157 (+5) artillery systems – 31789
The Kremlin continues to insist that the 2022 Istanbul negotiations are the only acceptable departure point for potential future negotiations on the war in Ukraine, thereby demanding that Russia and
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 20 August 2025 Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved the tactical situation. Units of the Sever Group of
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.08.25: personnel: about 1 072 700 (+920) personstanks: 11 119 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 152 (+4)artillery systems: 31 748 (+50)MLRS:
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 20.08.25: personnel: about 1 072 700 (+920) personstanks: 11 119 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 152 (+4)artillery systems: 31 748 (+50)MLRS:
Ukraine Military Situation Report | August 20 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Ukraine’s deep-strike campaign: Ukraine struck the Volgograd refinery, which produces
The Kremlin is demanding that Russia have a veto over any Western security guarantees for Ukraine in an effort to undermine ongoing US, European, and Ukrainian efforts to establish conditions
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 19 August 2025 Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range high-precision weapons, as
19 August, 2025, 6:53 AM EEST The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 19.08.25: personnel: about 1 071 780 (+890) personstanks: 11 118 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 23
two assault brigades, and two assault regiments of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, and one territorial defence brigade close to Leninskoye, Andreyevka, Alekseyevka, Stepnoye, Varachino, Novaya Sech, and Yunakovka (Sumy
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
