The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 12.05.25: personnel: about 967 060 (+1 170) persons tanks: 10 800 (+8) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 473
Russian officials appear to be setting conditions for Russian President Vladimir Putin to reject Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky’s invitation to meet on May 15 in Istanbul for bilateral ceasefire negotiations. Russian
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 11 May 2025 In accordance with the order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, all
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 11.05.25: personnel: about 965 890 (+1 310) persons tanks: 10 792 (+2) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 446
Russian President Vladimir Putin called for Russia and Ukraine to resume bilateral negotiations based on the early 2022 Istanbul protocols that include Russian demands amounting to full Ukrainian surrender. Any
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 10 May 2025 In accordance with the order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation,
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 10.05.25: personnel: about 964 580 (+1 310) persons tanks: 10 790 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 440
Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov rejected another US-Ukrainian general ceasefire proposal on May 10 amid continued Russian demands that any future ceasefire include conditions that support Russia’s long-term goal of gaining
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 3-9 May 2025 In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation,
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 9.05.25: personnel: about 963 270 (+1 300) persons tanks: 10 786 (+4) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 433
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
