The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 26.06.25: personnel: about 1 015 750 (+1100) personstanks: 10 968 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 892 (+7) artillery
South Korean intelligence suggests that North Korea may deploy North Korean troops to Ukrainian territory, which would represent a significant battlefield inflection. Reuters, citing a South Korean lawmaker privy to intelligence
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 25 June 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 25.06.25: personnel: about 1 014 650 (+950) persons tanks: 10 967 (+1) troop-carrying AFVs:
US President Donald Trump stated that Russia may have territorial ambitions beyond Ukraine — consistent with ISW’s long-held assessments that Russia is preparing for a future conflict with NATO and
At night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered a group strike by high-precision weapons and attack drones at facilities of the Ukrainian defence industry in Kiev region, infrastructure of a
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.06.25: personnel: about 1 012 500 (+1 010) persons tanks: 10 965 (+1) troop-carrying
The Kremlin continues to only diplomatically support Iran, showcasing the limitations in the Russian-Iranian strategic relationship. Russian President Vladimir Putin, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov, Russian Presidential Aide Yuriy Ushakov, and
. Units of the Sever Group of Forces improved their position along the front line, hit clusters of manpower and hardware of five mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade, one air assault regiment, four assault regiments of the
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 22.06.25: personnel: about 1 011 490 (+1 100) persons tanks: 10 964 (+9) troop-carrying
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
