Ukrainian forces recently liberated territory including part of the city of Kupyansk in a tactical counterattack in the Kupyansk direction. Ukrainian 2nd Khartiya Corps reported on December 12 that Ukrainian forces
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The units of the Sever Group of Forces have completed the liberation of Liman in Kharkov region. Russian
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 11.12.25: personnel: about 1 185 080 (+1 460) personstanks: 11 404 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 699 (+7)artillery systems: 34 992
Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov effectively rejected seven points of the US-proposed 28-point peace plan on December 11, including the original plan’s points on territorial swaps based on the line
Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of one air assault brigade, one assault regiment of the
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 10.12.25: personnel: about 1 183 620 (+1 010) personstanks: 11 404 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 692 (+1)artillery systems: 34 969
Ukraine Military Situation Report | December 10 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Ukraine begins to withdraw from Pokrovsk: The Ukrainian high command
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 9 December 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The units of the Sever
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 09.12.25: personnel: about 1 182 610 (+930) personstanks: 11 403 (+0)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 691 (+2)artillery systems: 34 944 (+27)MLRS:
The Kremlin is significantly intensifying its cognitive warfare effort to present the Russian military and economy as able to inevitably win a war of attrition against Ukraine. High-ranking Kremlin officials, including
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
