The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.11.24: personnel: about 722 440 (+1 560) personstanks: 9 365 (+15)troop-carrying AFVs: 19 059 (+38)artillery systems: 20 586 (+30)MLRS:
Russian officials continued to use threatening rhetoric as part of efforts to deter the United States from publicly authorizing Ukraine’s use of US-provided ATACMS in limited strikes against Russian and
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.11.24: personnel: about 720 880 (+1 640) personstanks: 9 350 (+12)troop-carrying AFVs: 19 021 (+27)artillery systems: 20 556 (+36)MLRS:
This morning, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered a massive strike by high-precision air- and sea-based weapons, strike drones on critical energy infrastructure facilities that supported the Ukrainian defence industry
The New York Times (NYT) and Washington Post reported that US President Joe Biden has authorized Ukrainian forces to use US-provided ATACMS in limited strikes against Russian and North Korean military targets within Kursk
defeated formations of foreign mercenaries, manpower, and hardware of 122nd and 125th territorial defence brigades near Veliky Burluk, Malye Prokhody, and Volchansk (Kharkov region). The AFU losses were up to 70 troops, four 152-mm D-20 howitzers, and three 122-mm D-30 howitzers. Two ammunition depots
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.11.24: personnel: about 719 240 (+1 650) personstanks: 9 338 (+8)troop-carrying AFVs: 18 994 (+26)artillery systems: 20 520 (+28)MLRS:
Ukrainian drone operations continue to play a critical role in constraining Russian mechanized maneuver and preventing Russian forces from fully exploiting Ukraine’s ongoing manpower constraints. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated during
From 9 to 15 November, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation have launched 42 group strikes by high-precision weapons and unmanned aerial vehicles, which hit power industry facilities used to support Ukrainian
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 14.11.24: personnel: about 716 070 (+1 690) personstanks: 9 319 (+19)troop-carrying AFVs: 18 947 (+19)artillery systems: 20 472 (+64)MLRS:
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
