The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 18.08.25: personnel: about 1 070 890 (+940) personstanks: 11 118 (+2)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 148 (+5)artillery systems: 31 632 (+43)MLRS:
The Kremlin did not publicly commit to a bilateral or trilateral leader-level meeting, contrary to US President Donald Trump’s announcement following the August 18 multilateral summit. Trump stated that he called
med Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on manpower and hardware of two heavy mechanised brigades, four mechanised
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 17.08.25: personnel: about 1 069 950 (+900) persons tanks: 11 116 (+4)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 143 (+8)
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 16 August 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 16.08.25: personnel: about 1 069 050 (+1 010) persons tanks: 11 112 (+6)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 135 (+2)
Various US officials indicated that Russian President Vladimir Putin may be willing to compromise on some war termination demands, but Putin’s own statements and Russian official statements contradict these claims. US
Russian Ministry of Defense: up to 7,890 Ukrainian casualties from Aug 9 to 15; Russia shoots down a Ukrainian Su-27 warplane Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as
Ukrainian General Staff: about 940 Russian casualties in the past day The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 15.08.25: personnel: about 1 068 040 (+940) persons
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
