Ukrainian General Staff: about 1,080 Russian casualties in the past day
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 26.07.25: personnel: about 1 048 330 (+1 080) persons tanks: 11 056 (+7) troop-carrying
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 26.07.25: personnel: about 1 048 330 (+1 080) persons tanks: 11 056 (+7) troop-carrying
Russian forces conducted a combined missile and drone strike against Ukraine on the night of July 25 to 26 and appear to be increasingly integrating missiles into overnight strike packages
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 19–25 July 2025 From 19 to 25 July, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out ten group strikes, including
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 25.07.25: personnel: about 1 047 250 (+980) persons tanks: 11 049 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 052 (+5)
Russian officials continue to delay high-level negotiations between Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and Russian President Vladimir Putin amid US calls for a meeting. Kremlin Spokesperson Dmitry Peskov claimed on July 25
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 24 July 2025 Last night, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out a group strike with long-range high-precision weapons,
personnel: about 1 046 270 (+1050) persons tanks: 11 046 (+5)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 047 (+10) artillery systems: 30 746 (+24)
Russia will likely implement new policies to augment its military administrative capacity to significantly expand the rate at which Russia can call up a larger volume of conscripts and reservists. Russian
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. As a result of resolute actions, units of the Sever Group of Forces liberated Varachino (Sumy region). Losses
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.07.25: personnel: about 1 045 220 (+970) persons tanks:11 041 (+3)troop-carrying AFVs:23 037 (+2)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.