The details of the ceasefire agreements on energy strikes and maritime operations in the Black Sea that US, Ukrainian, and Russian officials reached on March 24 and 25 remain unclear.
️ The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of two
personnel: about 905 940 (+1 180) persons tanks: 10 425 (+5) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 670 (+18) artillery systems: 25 190 (+61) MLRS: 1 341 (+3)anti-aircraft systems: 1
US, Ukrainian, and Russian officials reached some agreements for temporary ceasefires on strikes against energy infrastructure and in the Black Sea. The details of these ceasefires remain unclear and evaluating
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted fire damage on manpower and hardware of four mechanised
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 24.03.25: personnel: about 904 760 (+1 280) personstanks: 10 420 (+8)troop-carrying AFVs: 21 652 (+16)artillery systems: 25 129 (+81)MLRS:
US and Russian delegations met in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on March 24 following US–Ukrainian talks on March 23 about the details of temporary ceasefires on long-range strikes and in the
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces inflicted losses on formations of the UAV brigade
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.03.25: personnel: about 903 480 (+1 470) persons tanks: 10 412 (+9) troop-carrying AFVs: 21 636 (+27)
US and Ukrainian officials are meeting in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia on the evening of March 23 to discuss the contours of the temporary moratorium on long-range strikes and a possible
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
