The official Kremlin spokesperson and the Russian Security Council secretary repeated a series of long-standing Russian demands that purposely preclude the establishment of a stable and enduring peace in Ukraine
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, units of the Sever Group of Forces engaged formations of three mechanised brigades, one air assault brigade
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 22.04.25: personnel: about 943 060 (+1 130) personstanks: 10 683 (+4)troop-carrying AFVs: 22 296 (+19)artillery systems: 26 689 (+26)
The Financial Times (FT) reported that Russian President Vladimir Putin is willing to end the war in Ukraine on the current frontlines. Kremlin officials, including Putin, have repeatedly and explicitly emphasized that
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. In Belgorod direction, the Sever Group of Forces have inflicted fire damage on units of three mechanised brigades and
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 23.04.25: personnel: about 944 270 (+1 210) personstanks: 10 691 (+8) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 307 (+11)artillery systems: 26 774 (+85)
Ukraine Military Situation Report | April 23 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Chinese support for Moscow’s war: Ukraine’s military intelligence service revealed
The United States reportedly recently presented Ukraine with a seven-point proposal to end the war in Ukraine in which the United States would recognize Crimea as part of Russia and
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 21 April 2025 In accordance with the order of the Supreme Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation, all
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 21.04.25: personnel: about 941 770 (+670) personstanks: 10 679 (+2) troop-carrying AFVs: 22 273 (+2)artillery systems: 26 659 (+10)
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
