Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 23–29 August 2025 From 23 to 29 August, the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation carried out seven group strikes
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 29.08.25: personnel: about 1 080 480 (+840) personstanks: 11 143 (+4)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 191 (+6)artillery systems: 32 125 (+61)
Russia reportedly leveraged the August 15 Alaska Summit in order to stall for a planned Fall 2025 offensive, among other things. A German source with insider knowledge told Reuters that Ukrainian
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 28 August 2025 Last night, the Russian Armed Forces carried out a high-precision group strike with long-range air-to-surface weapons, including Kinzhal hypersonic
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 28.08.25: personnel: about 1 079 630 (+880) personstanks: 11 139 (+4)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 185 (+7)artillery systems: 32 064 (+40)
Russia killed at least 21 civilians, including children, and damaged civilian infrastructure and European diplomatic facilities during the second largest strike of the war thus far and the largest strike
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 27 August 2025 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The Sever Group of Forces
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 27.08.25: personnel: about 1 078 750 (+920) personstanks: 11 135 (+1)troop-carrying AFVs: 23 178 (+0)artillery systems: 32 024 (+45)MLRS:
Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Ukraine introduces heavy cruise missile: Dubbed the Flamingo, Kyiv’s new indigenously produced cruise missile boasts a
Limited Russian tactical forces recently infiltrated Ukrainian defenses in two border settlements in Dnipropetrovsk Oblast but have not established enduring positions in the area. The Ukrainian General Staff and Ukrainian Dnipro
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
