The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 07.12.24: personnel: about 751 910 (+1 300) persons tanks: 9 514 (+0) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 535 (+17)artillery systems: 21 055 (+12)MLRS:
Russian forces have not yet evacuated the Russian naval base in Tartus, Syria as of December 6, but it remains unclear whether Russia will keep its vessels at the port
From 30 November to 6 December 2024 , the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation delivered six group strikes by precision weaponry and attack unmanned aerial vehicles at power facilities that support the work of the
the estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 06.12.24: personnel: about 750 610 (+1 660) persons tanks: 9 514 (+8) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 518 (+46)artillery systems: 21 043 (+20)MLRS:
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 05.12.24: personnel: about 748 950 (+1 580) persons tanks: 9 506 (+13) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 472 (+22)artillery systems: 21 023 (+21)MLRS:
The Kremlin is continuing to suffer significant manpower losses to make tactical advances in western Donetsk Oblast at the expense of Russia’s ongoing war effort and the medium-term viability of
In Kharkov direction, the Sever Group of Forces hit formations of the 5th Border Detachment of the State Border Guard Service of Ukraine near Alisovka (Kharkov region). Russian units repelled two counter-attacks of the 58th Motorised Infantry
The estimated total combat losses of the enemy from 24.02.22 to 04.12.24: personnel: about 747 370 (+1 670) persons tanks: 9 493 (+7) troop-carrying AFVs: 19 450 (+31)artillery systems: 21 002 (+26)MLRS:
Ukraine Military Situation Report | December 4 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the war in Ukraine. Executive Summary — The United States agreed to supply
Mounting evidence continues to personally implicate Russian President Vladimir Putin and other senior Kremlin officials in the forced deportation and “re-education” of Ukrainian children in Russia. The US Department of State
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
