Enemy losses on January 27, 2026: 690 personnel, 1,012 UAVs, and 22 artillery systems. According to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the estimated total combat losses
Ukraine Military Situation Report | January 28 Below Hudson Senior Fellow Can Kasapoğlu offers a military situation report about the Russia-Ukraine War. Executive Summary — Russian drone unit recruitment: To capitalize on the success
The People’s Republic of China (PRC) continues to provide critical support to Russia’s weapons production, including Oreshnik missiles and Shahed long-range drones. The Telegraph reported on January 28 that it has identified $10.3
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 27 January 2026 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. The Sever Group of Forces
Enemy losses on January 26, 2026: 820 personnel, 899 UAVs, and 47 artillery systems. According to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the estimated total combat losses
The United States is reportedly pushing Ukraine to cede the remainder of Donetsk Oblast to Russia in exchange for US security guarantees. ISW continues to assess that Ukrainian concessions of
Russian Defence Ministry on progress of special military operation as of 26 January 2026 The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group
Enemy losses on January 24, 2026: 1,020 personnel, 917 UAVs, and 32 artillery systems. According to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine, the estimated total combat losses
The United States and Europe are finalizing security and economic guarantees with Ukraine that aim to deter future Russian aggression and rebuild Ukraine’s post-war economy. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky stated on
The Armed Forces of the Russian Federation continue the special military operation. Units of the Sever Group of Forces took more advantageous lines and positions. Losses were inflicted on units
Forced displacement represents one of the most pressing humanitarian issues of our time. Individuals and families, torn from the fabric of their communities, find themselves navigating a world of uncertainty, often without basic necessities or a clear path to safety. There are currently some 110 million forced displaced, and this number is growing by 10 million each year!
At the heart of this crisis are the political triggers. Armed conflicts, ethnic or religious persecutions, and systemic human rights abuses force millions to flee their homes in terror. Many are displaced within their own national boundaries, while others seek asylum abroad. If these factors change as a result of political shifts at home or the pressures from abroad, they can return to their homes. Forced displacement is thus different from environmentally driven displacement, as victims of climate change may never be able to return to their homes.
The ramifications of any sort of displacement are profound, not just for those directly affected, but also for host communities and countries. Overburdened infrastructures, socio-economic strains, and cultural tensions can arise, necessitating comprehensive strategies to foster harmony and integration. Yet the root causes of forced displacement can be remedied with a concerted focus by local players and international diplomacy.
Organizations like Refugees International play a crucial role in this arena, advocating for the rights and needs of the displaced, conducting on-the-ground assessments, and influencing policymakers to take informed actions. Their relentless work underscores the gravity of the situation and the urgency ofinternational cooperation. But they, too, are overwhelmed by the rapid expansion of the crisis.
International Humanitarian Law (IHL), with its core principles centered on the protection of civilians during conflicts, plays a pivotal role in this discourse. Yet, despite clear legal frameworks, compliance remains
inconsistent. This initiative emphasizes the importance of upholding and reinforcing these international standards.
It’s not just about recognizing the problem; it’s about active engagement. We urge governments, organizations, and individuals to prioritize the rights and needs of the forced displaced. Through collective efforts, informed policies, and sustained advocacy, we can shift the narrative from passive acknowledgment to proactive intervention.
